Literature DB >> 20675808

Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.

Mary Kim Ngo1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

Presenting an auditory or tactile cue in temporal synchrony with a change in the color of a visual target can facilitate participants' visual search performance. In the present study, we compared the magnitude of unimodal auditory, vibrotactile, and bimodal (i.e., multisensory) cuing benefits when the nonvisual cues were presented in temporal synchrony with the changing of the target's color (Experiments 1 and 2). The target (a horizontal or vertical line segment) was presented among a number of distractors (tilted line segments) that also changed color at various times. In Experiments 3 and 4, the cues were also made spatially informative with regard to the location of the visual target. The unimodal and bimodal cues gave rise to an equivalent (significant) facilitation of participants' visual search performance relative to a no-cue baseline condition. Making the unimodal auditory and vibrotactile cues spatially informative produced further performance improvements (on validly cued trials), as compared with cues that were spatially uninformative or otherwise spatially invalid. A final experiment was conducted in order to determine whether cue location (close to versus far from the visual display) would influence participants' visual search performance. Auditory cues presented close to the visual search display were found to produce significantly better performance than cues presented over headphones. Taken together, these results have implications for the design of nonvisual and multisensory warning signals used in complex visual displays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675808     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  Unmasking the dichoptic mask by sound: spatial congruency matters.

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cross-modal warnings for orienting attention in older drivers with and without attention impairments.

Authors:  Monica N Lees; Joshua Cosman; John D Lee; Shaun P Vecera; Jeffrey D Dawson; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Audio-visual spatial alignment improves integration in the presence of a competing audio-visual stimulus.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Abigail L Noyce; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Edward Awh; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06

Review 5.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  The attentional window modulates capture by audiovisual events.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Christian N L Olivers; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Predictive coding and multisensory integration: an attentional account of the multisensory mind.

Authors:  Durk Talsma
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-26

8.  Multisensory simultaneity judgment and proximity to the body.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Marta Lukowska; Mark Wallace; Andrea Serino
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.

Authors:  Rebecca E Paladini; Lorenzo Diana; Giuseppe A Zito; Thomas Nyffeler; Patric Wyss; Urs P Mosimann; René M Müri; Tobias Nef; Dario Cazzoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Window of audio-visual simultaneity is unaffected by spatio-temporal visual clutter.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; John Cass; David Alais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.