Literature DB >> 20675790

Implied body action directs spatial attention.

Will M Gervais1, Catherine L Reed, Paula M Beall, Ralph J Roberts.   

Abstract

Research confirms that the body influences perception, but little is known about the embodiment of attention. We investigated whether the implied actions of others direct spatial attention, using a lateralized covert-orienting task with nonpredictive central cues depicting static, right/left-facing bodies poised in midaction. Validity effects (decreased response times for validly compared with invalidly cued trials) indicated orienting in the direction of the implied action. In Experiment 1, we compared action (running, throwing) with nonaction (standing) cues. Only the action cues produced validity effects, suggesting that implied action directs attention. The action cues produced faster responses overall, suggesting that action cues prime motor responses. In Experiment 2, we determined whether action cues shifted attention in a specific direction rather than to a general side of space: Two cues had similar action speed and motor effort but differed in implied direction (jumping, vertical; throwing, horizontal). Validity effects were found only for the throw cues for which the implied motion direction was consistent with lateralized target locations. In Experiment 3, we compared block-like stimuli to the throwing action stimuli to examine whether lower level perceptual information could account for the attention effects alone. Validity effects were found only for the human-action stimuli. Overall, the results suggest that predictive simulations of action shift attention in action-consistent directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675790     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  12 in total

Review 1.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Hands in motion: an upper-limb-selective area in the occipitotemporal cortex shows sensitivity to viewed hand kinematics.

Authors:  Tanya Orlov; Yuval Porat; Tamar R Makin; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Biological motion cues trigger reflexive attentional orienting.

Authors:  Jinfu Shi; Xuchu Weng; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-09-29

4.  Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance.

Authors:  Emily K Bloesch; Christopher C Davoli; Noam Roth; James R Brockmole; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

5.  Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing.

Authors:  Alon Hafri; John C Trueswell; Brent Strickland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-02-17

6.  Implied motion perception from a still image in infancy.

Authors:  Nobu Shirai; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Communicative interactions improve visual detection of biological motion.

Authors:  Valeria Manera; Cristina Becchio; Ben Schouten; Bruno G Bara; Karl Verfaillie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Emergence of the ability to perceive dynamic events from still pictures in human infants.

Authors:  Nobu Shirai; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Does movement influence representations of time and space?

Authors:  Jonna Loeffler; Markus Raab; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do People "Pop Out"?

Authors:  Katja M Mayer; Quoc C Vuong; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.