Literature DB >> 16805870

The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: a critical review.

Samuel B Hutton1, Ulrich Ettinger.   

Abstract

The antisaccade task is a measure of volitional control of behavior sensitive to fronto-striatal dysfunction. Here we outline important issues concerning antisaccade methodology, consider recent evidence of the cognitive processes and neural mechanisms involved in task performance, and review how the task has been applied to study psychopathology. We conclude that the task yields reliable and sensitive measures of the processes involved in resolving the conflict between volitional and reflexive behavioral responses, a key cognitive deficit relevant to a number of neuropsychiatric conditions. Additionally, antisaccade deficits may reflect genetic liability for schizophrenia. Finally, the ease and accuracy with which the task can be administered, combined with its sensitivity to fronto-striatal dysfunction and the availability of suitable control conditions, may make it a useful benchmark tool for studies of potential cognitive enhancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16805870     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00403.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  143 in total

1.  Dissociable and common deficits in inhibitory control in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Tessa Christodoulou; Lambros Messinis; Panagiotis Papathanasopoulos; Sophia Frangou
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Executive control in chronic schizophrenia: A perspective from manual stimulus-response compatibility task performance.

Authors:  Simone D Behrwind; Manuel Dafotakis; Sarah Halfter; Kerstin Hobusch; Mark Berthold-Losleben; Edna C Cieslik; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Prosaccade errors in the antisaccade task: differences between corrected and uncorrected errors and links to neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Alison C Bowling; Emily A Hindman; James F Donnelly
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Antisaccade performance in schizophrenia patients, their first-degree biological relatives, and community comparison subjects: data from the COGS study.

Authors:  Allen D Radant; Dorcas J Dobie; Monica E Calkins; Ann Olincy; David L Braff; Kristin S Cadenhead; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Tiffany A Greenwood; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Gregory A Light; Sean P Meichle; Steve P Millard; Jim Mintz; Keith H Nuechterlein; Nicholas J Schork; Larry J Seidman; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Ming T Tsuang; Bruce I Turetsky; Debby W Tsuang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Is the relationship of prosaccade reaction times and antisaccade errors mediated by working memory?

Authors:  Trevor J Crawford; Elisabeth Parker; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jenny Mayes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Inhibitory control and emotion dysregulation: A framework for research on anxiety.

Authors:  Elise M Cardinale; Anni R Subar; Melissa A Brotman; Ellen Leibenluft; Katharina Kircanski; Daniel S Pine
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2019-04-10

7.  Anxiety, a benefit and detriment to cognition: behavioral and magnetoencephalographic evidence from a mixed-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian R Cornwell; Sven C Mueller; Raphael Kaplan; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Gaze-Based Assessments of Vigilance and Avoidance in Social Anxiety: a Review.

Authors:  Nigel T M Chen; Patrick J F Clarke
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 9.  Electrophysiological Endophenotypes for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emily M Owens; Peter Bachman; David C Glahn; Carrie E Bearden
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Response inhibition and response monitoring in a saccadic double-step task in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Jeffrey D Schall; Gordon D Logan; Sohee Park
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.