Literature DB >> 26768458

Sectional matrix: Step-by-step directions for their clinical use.

V Alonso de la Peña1, R Pernas García1, R Pérez García1.   

Abstract

The sectional matrix is the best way to achieve a strong contact point in Class II restorations with composite resin in the posterior dental sector. The pre-wedging is essential to get a separation between teeth which avoid the matrix deformation during its insertion. This article describes the clinical technique for restoring Class II cavities using a sectional matrix.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26768458     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  19 in total

1.  Primary preparation of class II cavities with oscillating systems.

Authors:  Michael J Wicht; Rainer Haak; Ulrike B Fritz; Michael J Noack
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.

Authors:  Anuradha Prakki; Renato Cilli; João Otávio Chalup Saad; José Roberto Rodrigues
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites.

Authors:  B A C Loomans; N J M Opdam; F J M Roeters; E M Bronkhorst; R C W Burgersdijk; C E Dörfer
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness of Class II restorations.

Authors:  Bas A C Loomans; Niek J M Opdam; Joost F M Roeters; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Alphons J M Plasschaert
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.

Authors:  M H Saber; W El-Badrawy; B A C Loomans; D R Ahmed; C E Dörfer; A El Zohairy
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.440

6.  The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Dimitris Kampouropoulos; Charikleia Paximada; Michalis Loukidis; Afrodite Kakaboura
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 7.  Influence of the operatory field isolation technique on tooth-colored direct dental restorations.

Authors:  Marlus Roberto Rodrigues Cajazeira; Ticiana Medeiros De Sabóia; Lucianne Cople Maia
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.522

8.  Influence of interdental contacts on periodontal status.

Authors:  E B Hancock; C V Mayo; R R Schwab; M R Wirthlin
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  A clinical study on interdental separation techniques.

Authors:  Bas A Loomans; N J M Opdam; E M Bronkhorst; F J M Roeters; C E Dörfer
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  Optimizing tooth form with direct posterior composite restorations.

Authors:  Ramya Raghu; Raghu Srinivasan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Matrix Band Systems for Posterior Proximal Restorations among Egyptian Dentists: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Omar Osama Shaalan
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2020-12

2.  Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Hind P Bhatia; Shveta Sood; Naresh Sharma; Akshara Singh; Varshini Rajagopal
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.