Literature DB >> 9088560

Effects of movement and movement imagery on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

R Kakigi1, M Shimojo, M Hoshiyama, S Koyama, S Watanabe, D Naka, H Suzuki, A Nakamura.   

Abstract

We examined the "gating" effects caused by active and passive movements of toes and by "movement imagery" (mental moving of the toe without actual movements) on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve in normal subjects. Active and passive movements significantly attenuated the short- and middle-latency cortical components (P < 0.001) with no latency change, and the effects of the active movements were larger than those of the passive movements. In contrast, the subsequent long-latency component with a latency of about 100 ms was enhanced only by the active movements. Therefore, both centrifugal and centripetal mechanisms should be considered. The gating effects by movements on all components may occur in the primary sensory cortex (SI) in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated nerve, because all of the equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of the components in the "control" and each "interference" waveform were located there. Active movements of the toes contralateral to the stimulated nerve caused no significant gating effect. The short-latency components were not consistently changed by "movement imagery", but the middle- and long-latency components were enhanced. Their ECDs were located in the SI contralateral to the stimulated nerve and in the SII in bilateral hemispheres. Therefore, we speculated that brain responses to somatosensory stimulation, particularly components generated in SII, were affected by volitional changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9088560     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(97)00002-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  5 in total

1.  Changes in the centrifugal gating effect on somatosensory evoked potentials depending on the level of contractile force.

Authors:  T Wasaka; H Nakata; T Kida; R Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sensorimotor integration in S2, PV, and parietal rostroventral areas of the human sylvian fissure.

Authors:  Leighton B Hinkley; Leah A Krubitzer; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Elizabeth A Disbrow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Active and passive touch differentially activate somatosensory cortex in texture perception.

Authors:  Cristina Simões-Franklin; Teresa Aisling Whitaker; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Somatosensory processing of the tongue in humans.

Authors:  Kiwako Sakamoto; Hiroki Nakata; Masato Yumoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  The effect of unpredicted visual feedback on activation in the secondary somatosensory cortex during movement execution.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.288

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.