Literature DB >> 20667688

Initial experience with the oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Geoffrey F Dervin1, Chris Carruthers, Robert J Feibel, Alan A Giachino, Paul R Kim, Peter R Thurston.   

Abstract

Our initial experience with mobile bearing medial compartment unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) is presented to highlight lessons that have been learned to avoid short-term failures. Consecutive cases of the Oxford medial UKA performed between February 2001 and April 2006 were reviewed to derive those cases that were revised to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were 545 patients available with mean age and body mass index of 65.0 and 30.1, respectively. At final follow-up, 32 patients were revised for lateral compartment arthritis, aseptic component loosening, persisting medial or anterior pain and dislocated meniscal bearing. Revisions were performed with primary unconstrained TKA implants with no stems or wedges required. Our results seem to reflect those seen in registries confirming an earlier higher revision rate and highlight the technical issues of overstuffing the compartment, inadequate cementation technique, and strict adherence to patient selection.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20667688     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

1.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice.

Authors:  William C Schroer; C Lowry Barnes; Paul Diesfeld; Angela LeMarr; Rachel Ingrassia; Diane J Morton; Mary Reedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre.

Authors:  Huaming Xue; Yihui Tu; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Medial unicondylar knee replacement].

Authors:  O Lorbach; D Pape; P Mosser; D Kohn; K Anagnostakos
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.

Authors:  B Kerens; M G M Schotanus; B Boonen; P Boog; P J Emans; H Lacroix; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Current fit of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wolfgang Fitz; Robin Bliss; Elena Losina
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  Medial femoral condyle fracture as an intraoperative complication of Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Bart Ten Brinke; Laurens J de Haan; Koen L M Koenraadt; Rutger C I van Geenen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: are failure modes different?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Daoyun Chen; Chen Zhu; Xiaoyun Pan; Xin Mao; Yongyuan Guo; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A high rate of tibial plateau fractures after early experience with patient-specific instrumentation for unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  A M Leenders; M G M Schotanus; R J P Wind; R A P Borghans; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Good accuracy of the Phase III Oxford Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Instrumentation.

Authors:  Rudi G Bitsch; Arvind von Keudell; Elena Losina; Wolfgang Fitz
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Valgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  A D Liddle; H G Pandit; C Jenkins; P Lobenhoffer; W F M Jackson; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.