Literature DB >> 20666687

Perception of temporal fine-structure cues in speech with minimal envelope cues for listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Marine Ardoint1, Stanley Sheft, Pierre Fleuriot, Stéphane Garnier, Christian Lorenzi.   

Abstract

The contribution of temporal fine-structure (TFS) cues to consonant identification was compared for seven young adults with normal hearing and five young adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss and flat, high- or low-frequency gently sloping audiograms. Nonsense syllables were degraded using two schemes (PM: phase modulation; FM: frequency modulation) designed to remove temporal envelope (E) cues while preserving TFS cues in 16 0.35-octave-wide frequency bands spanning the range of 80 to 8020 Hz. For both schemes, hearing-impaired listeners performed significantly above chance level (PM: 36%; FM: 31%; chance level: 6.25%), but more poorly than normal-hearing listeners (PM: 80%; FM: 65%). Three hearing-impaired listeners showed normal or near-normal reception of nasality information. These results indicate that for mild to moderate levels of hearing loss, cochlear damage reduces but does not abolish the ability to use the TFS cues of speech. The deficits observed for both schemes in hearing-impaired listeners suggest involvement of factors other than only poor reconstruction of temporal envelope from temporal fine structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20666687     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.492402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  15 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

3.  The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christian Lorenzi; Kaibao Nie; Xing Li; Elyse M Jameyson; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Masood Delfarah; Jordan L Vasko; Brittney L Carter; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Sarah Drehobl; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of narrowband and broadband signals in the auditory periphery.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

10.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Valeriy Shafiro; Christian Lorenzi; Rachel McMullen; Caitlin Farrell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.