Literature DB >> 20666263

Active adaptive conservation of threatened species in the face of uncertainty.

Eve McDonald-Madden1, William J M Probert, Cindy E Hauser, Michael C Runge, Hugh P Possingham, Menna E Jones, Joslin L Moore, Tracy M Rout, Peter A Vesk, Brendan A Wintle.   

Abstract

Adaptive management has a long history in the natural resource management literature, but despite this, few practitioners have developed adaptive strategies to conserve threatened species. Active adaptive management provides a framework for valuing learning by measuring the degree to which it improves long-run management outcomes. The challenge of an active adaptive approach is to find the correct balance between gaining knowledge to improve management in the future and achieving the best short-term outcome based on current knowledge. We develop and analyze a framework for active adaptive management of a threatened species. Our case study concerns a novel facial tumor disease affecting the Australian threatened species Sarcophilus harrisii: the Tasmanian devil. We use stochastic dynamic programming with Bayesian updating to identify the management strategy that maximizes the Tasmanian devil population growth rate, taking into account improvements to management through learning to better understand disease latency and the relative effectiveness of three competing management options. Exactly which management action we choose each year is driven by the credibility of competing hypotheses about disease latency and by the population growth rate predicted by each hypothesis under the competing management actions. We discover that the optimal combination of management actions depends on the number of sites available and the time remaining to implement management. Our approach to active adaptive management provides a framework to identify the optimal amount of effort to invest in learning to achieve long-run conservation objectives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20666263     DOI: 10.1890/09-0647.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

Review 1.  International funding agencies: potential leaders of impact evaluation in protected areas?

Authors:  Ian D Craigie; Megan D Barnes; Jonas Geldmann; Stephen Woodley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Strategies for sustainable management of renewable resources during environmental change.

Authors:  Emilie Lindkvist; Örjan Ekeberg; Jon Norberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Waiting can be an optimal conservation strategy, even in a crisis discipline.

Authors:  Gwenllian D Iacona; Hugh P Possingham; Michael Bode
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Living on the edge: assessing the extinction risk of critically endangered Bonelli's eagle in Italy.

Authors:  Pascual López-López; Maurizio Sarà; Massimiliano Di Vittorio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Adaptive management and the value of information: learning via intervention in epidemiology.

Authors:  Katriona Shea; Michael J Tildesley; Michael C Runge; Christopher J Fonnesbeck; Matthew J Ferrari
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 6.  Taming wildlife disease: bridging the gap between science and management.

Authors:  Maxwell B Joseph; Joseph R Mihaljevic; Ana Lisette Arellano; Jordan G Kueneman; Daniel L Preston; Paul C Cross; Pieter T J Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 6.528

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.