Literature DB >> 26460135

International funding agencies: potential leaders of impact evaluation in protected areas?

Ian D Craigie1, Megan D Barnes2, Jonas Geldmann3, Stephen Woodley4.   

Abstract

Globally, protected areas are the most commonly used tools to halt biodiversity loss. Yet, some are failing to adequately conserve the biodiversity they contain. There is an urgent need for knowledge on how to make them function more effectively. Impact evaluation methods provide a set of tools that could yield this knowledge. However, rigorous outcome-focused impact evaluation is not yet used as extensively as it could be in protected area management. We examine the role of international protected area funding agencies in facilitating the use of impact evaluation. These agencies are influential stakeholders as they allocate hundreds of millions of dollars annually to support protected areas, creating a unique opportunity to shape how the conservation funds are spent globally. We identify key barriers to the use of impact evaluation, detail how large funders are uniquely placed to overcome many of these, and highlight the potential benefits if impact evaluation is used more extensively.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Keywords:  GEF; World Bank; biodiversity; costs; monitoring; parks

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26460135      PMCID: PMC4614739          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  10 in total

1.  The need for evidence-based conservation.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Andrew S Pullin; Paul M Dolman; Teri M Knight
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts.

Authors:  Kerrie A Wilson; Marissa F McBride; Michael Bode; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation.

Authors:  Kwaw S Andam; Paul J Ferraro; Alexander Pfaff; G Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa; Juan A Robalino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines.

Authors:  Anthony Waldron; Arne O Mooers; Daniel C Miller; Nate Nibbelink; David Redding; Tyler S Kuhn; J Timmons Roberts; John L Gittleman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Realizing an effectiveness revolution in environmental management.

Authors:  Matt Keene; Andrew S Pullin
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  The performance and potential of protected areas.

Authors:  James E M Watson; Nigel Dudley; Daniel B Segan; Marc Hockings
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Moving Rio forward and avoiding 10 more years with little evidence for effective conservation policy.

Authors:  Brendan Fisher; Andrew Balmford; Paul J Ferraro; Louise Glew; Michael Mascia; Robin Naidoo; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Active adaptive conservation of threatened species in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Eve McDonald-Madden; William J M Probert; Cindy E Hauser; Michael C Runge; Hugh P Possingham; Menna E Jones; Joslin L Moore; Tracy M Rout; Peter A Vesk; Brendan A Wintle
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments.

Authors:  Paul J Ferraro; Subhrendu K Pattanayak
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the Global Database of Protected Area Management Effectiveness.

Authors:  Lauren Coad; Fiona Leverington; Kathryn Knights; Jonas Geldmann; April Eassom; Valerie Kapos; Naomi Kingston; Marcelo de Lima; Camilo Zamora; Ivon Cuardros; Christoph Nolte; Neil D Burgess; Marc Hockings
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Measuring the difference made by conservation initiatives: protected areas and their environmental and social impacts.

Authors:  Paul J Ferraro; Robert L Pressey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the Global Database of Protected Area Management Effectiveness.

Authors:  Lauren Coad; Fiona Leverington; Kathryn Knights; Jonas Geldmann; April Eassom; Valerie Kapos; Naomi Kingston; Marcelo de Lima; Camilo Zamora; Ivon Cuardros; Christoph Nolte; Neil D Burgess; Marc Hockings
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges.

Authors:  Gwenolé Le Velly; Céline Dutilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size.

Authors:  Megan D Barnes; Ian D Craigie; Luke B Harrison; Jonas Geldmann; Ben Collen; Sarah Whitmee; Andrew Balmford; Neil D Burgess; Thomas Brooks; Marc Hockings; Stephen Woodley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  An integrative framework for transformative social change: a case in global wildlife trade.

Authors:  Rumi Naito; Jiaying Zhao; Kai M A Chan
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Statistical matching for conservation science.

Authors:  Judith Schleicher; Johanna Eklund; Megan D Barnes; Jonas Geldmann; Johan A Oldekop; Julia P G Jones
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 6.560

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.