| Literature DB >> 22662239 |
Pascual López-López1, Maurizio Sarà, Massimiliano Di Vittorio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The population of Bonelli's eagle (Aquila fasciata) has declined drastically throughout its European range due to habitat degradation and unnatural elevated mortality. There are less than 1500 breeding pairs accounted for in Europe, and the species is currently catalogued as Critically Endangered in Italy, where the 22 territories of Sicily, represent nearly 95% of the entire Italian population. However, despite national and European conservation concerns, the species currently lacks a specific conservation plan, and no previous attempts to estimate the risk of extinction have been made. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22662239 PMCID: PMC3360590 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Parameters used to construct individual-based models for the Population Viability Analysis (PVA) of Bonelli’s eagle in Sicily (Italy).
| Parameter | Value | References |
| Number of runs (simulations) | 500 | 10,17 |
| Number of years for projection | 100 | 17 |
| Definition of extinction | just when one sex remains | 17 |
| Number of populations | 1 (isolated population; i.e. immigration = emigration) | |
| Dispersal | not modelled | |
| Reproductive system | monogamous | 20 |
| Age of first offspring (both sexes) | 3 years | 20 |
| Maximum age of reproduction | 35 years | 20 |
| Maximum number of progeny per year | 2 chicks | 17 |
| Sex ratio at birth (% males) | 50% | 17 |
| Density dependent effects on reproduction | not modelled | |
| Mean and SD of females breeding (%) | Mean and SD of the % of successful pairs according to fieldwork inSicily for the period 1990–2010 (breeding success mean 60.15; SD 21.05) | present study |
| Number offspring per female per year (% ineach class) | Mean of the % of nests with 1 or 2 chicks according to fieldwork inSicily for the period 1990–2010 (50% 1 chick; 50% 2 chicks) | present study |
| Males in breeding pool (%) | 100% | 17 |
| Specified age distribution | 10 individuals of age (1); 8 of age (2); 42 of age (3); all the breedingpopulation in age (3); equal number of malesand females. | present study |
| Carrying capacity (K) | 500 individuals | 17 |
| Harvesting | not modelled | |
| Supplementation | not modelled | |
| Mortality rates (in percentage): | ||
| from age 0 to 1: | 50.0 | 17,31/45 |
| from age 1 to 2: | 71.0 | 17,31/45 |
| from age 2 to 3: | 10.2 | 17,31/45 |
| after age 3: | 10.2 | 17,31/45 |
Juvenile mortality from [17] based on satellite telemetry data. Adult mortality from [31] and fieldwork based on turnover rates.
Juvenile and adult mortality from [45] based on capture-mark-recapture methods.
Figure 1Sensitivity analysis of the population growth rate (λ) and the probability of extinction (PE) of the Bonelli’s eagle’s population in Sicily in relation to different values of juvenile mortality (a-b), adult mortality (c-d), breeding success (e-f) and sex ratio at birth (f-g).
Simulations were run under two scenarios: (i) one including the combination of juvenile mortality values as reported in [17] based on satellite telemetry data, and adult mortality based on turnover rates in the Sicilian population [31] (black dots); and (ii) a second scenario using juvenile and adult mortality values as reported in [45] based on CMR methods (white triangles) (See text for further details). Note the sinusoidal shape of the curves of the PE in relation to juvenile and adult mortality, indicating that small variations in these demographic parameters may result in different values of PE (extra values within the interval 60–85% for juvenile mortality and within the interval 4–8% for adult mortality were included to highlight this relationship). The reported λ was calculated based on the stochastic growth rate (stoc-r).
Sensitivity values evaluated by the change in the population growth rate (λ) resulting from a given change in demographic parameters.
| Juvenile mortality | Adult mortality | Juvenile + Adult mortality | Breeding success | ||||||
| Change | Spain | France | Spain | France | Spain | France | Spain | France | |
| Increase | +30% | −5.07% | −4.50% | −2.57% | −2.86% | −6.95% | −7.32% | 1.21% | 1.61% |
| +25% | −4.69% | −3.92% | −2.27% | −2.76% | −5.92% | −6.39% | 1.11% | 1.31% | |
| +20% | −3.82% | −3.25% | −1.78% | −2.08% | −5.07% | −5.26% | 0.90% | 1.21% | |
| +15% | −2.66% | −2.47% | −1.29% | −0.60% | −3.54% | −3.73% | 0.80% | 0.70% | |
| +10% | −1.88% | −1.78% | −0.80% | −1.00% | −2.57% | −2.66% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
| +5% | −1.09% | −1.09% | −0.40% | −0.40% | −0.90% | −1.49% | 0.10% | 0.30% | |
| Status quo | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Decrease | −5% | 1.01% | 0.70% | 0.40% | 0.50% | 2.02% | 1.41% | −0.20% | −0.50% |
| −10% | 2.02% | 1.71% | 0.80% | 1.11% | 3.25% | 2.84% | −0.70% | −0.60% | |
| −15% | 3.46% | 2.84% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 5.87% | 4.39% | −0.80% | −0.90% | |
| −20% | 4.60% | 3.87% | 1.71% | 2.12% | 7.57% | 6.61% | −1.19% | −1.39% | |
| −25% | 6.18% | 5.23% | 2.12% | 2.63% | 9.97% | 9.09% | −1.59% | −1.59% | |
| −30% | 7.79% | 6.82% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 11.29% | 10.85% | − 1.98% | −2.08% | |
Figure 2Elasticity analysis showing the variation in the population growth rate (λ) resulting from proportional changes in juvenile mortality, adult mortality, juvenile and adult mortality considered together, and breeding success.
Simulations were performed using data from Spain (upper panel) and France (lower panel).