Literature DB >> 24763922

Face-sex categorization is better above fixation than below: Evidence from the reach-to-touch paradigm.

Genevieve L Quek1, Matthew Finkbeiner.   

Abstract

The masked congruence effect (MCE) elicited by nonconsciously presented faces in a sex-categorization task has recently been shown to be sensitive to the effects of attention. Here we investigated how spatial location along the vertical meridian modulates the MCE for face-sex categorization. Participants made left and right reaching movements to classify the sex of a target face that appeared either immediately above or below central fixation. The target was preceded by a masked prime face that was either congruent (i.e., same sex) or incongruent (i.e., opposite sex) with the target. In the reach-to-touch paradigm, participants typically classify targets more efficiently (i.e., their finger heads in the correct direction earlier and faster) on congruent than on incongruent trials. We observed an upper-hemifield advantage in the time course of this MCE, such that primes affected target classification sooner when they were presented in the upper visual field (UVF) rather than the lower visual field (LVF). Moreover, we observed a differential benefit of attention between the vertical hemifields, in that the MCE was dependent on the appropriate allocation of spatial attention in the LVF, but not the UVF. Taken together, these behavioral findings suggest that the processing of faces qua faces (e.g., sex-categorization) is more robust in upper-hemifield locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24763922     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0282-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  48 in total

1.  Target-tilt and vertical-hemifield asymmetries in free-scan search for 3-D targets.

Authors:  F H Previc; P D Naegele
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

2.  Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields.

Authors:  Michael W Levine; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Pointing the way to new constraints on the dynamical claims of computational models.

Authors:  Matthew Finkbeiner; Max Coltheart; Veronika Coltheart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; C L Grady; B Horwitz; L G Ungerleider; M Mishkin; R E Carson; P Herscovitch; M B Schapiro; S I Rapoport
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M I Sereno; A M Dale; J B Reppas; K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Ping Wei; Michael Dambacher; Ming Yan; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-01-05
View more
  5 in total

1.  Asymmetry in Gaze Direction Discrimination Between the Upper and Lower Visual Fields.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Gaining the upper hand: evidence of vertical asymmetry in sex-categorisation of human hands.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-12-31

3.  Converging Evidence of Ubiquitous Male Bias in Human Sex Perception.

Authors:  Justin Gaetano; Rick van der Zwan; Matthew Oxner; William G Hayward; Natalie Doring; Duncan Blair; Anna Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Perceived shift of the centres of contracting and expanding optic flow fields: Different biases in the lower-right and upper-right visual quadrants.

Authors:  Xiaorong Cheng; Chunmiao Lou; Xianfeng Ding; Wei Liu; Xueling Zhang; Zhao Fan; John Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Contextual and Spatial Associations Between Objects Interactively Modulate Visual Processing.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.