Literature DB >> 20664386

Ovarian suppression in normal-weight and obese women during oral contraceptive use: a randomized controlled trial.

Carolyn L Westhoff1, Anupama H Torgal, Elizabeth R Mayeda, Frank Z Stanczyk, Jodi P Lerner, Emma K T Benn, Myunghee Paik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess ovarian suppression during oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use among normal-weight and obese women using two OCP doses.
METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of two 21-day monophasic OCP formulations (20-microgram ethinyl estradiol [E2],/100-microgram levonorgestrel compared with 30-microgram ethinyl E2/150-microgram levonorgestrel) among normal-weight (body mass index 19.0-24.9) and obese (body mass index 30.0-39.9) women with regular menses and normal ovarian ultrasonography. Participants underwent transvaginal ultrasonography and phlebotomy twice weekly for 4 weeks during the third or fourth OCP cycle. We assessed OCP compliance using serum levonorgestrel levels. Outcomes included follicular development, endogenous E2 levels, ovulation, and self-reported bleeding patterns.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six women enrolled. One hundred eighty-one participants completed the study; we retained 150 consistent OCP users in the main analysis (96 normal weight, 54 obese). Consistent users of either OCP dose had substantial suppression of follicular development; obesity and follicular development were not related. Among the consistent OCP users, 2.7% ovulated during the study cycle (3 of 96 normal-weight and 1 of 54 obese participants). Two ovulations occurred with each OCP formulation. Inconsistent OCP use or nonuse during the study cycle was associated with more ovulation (P<.001). Normal-weight and obese participants had similar follicular development, endogenous estradiol levels, Hoogland scores, and bleeding patterns.
CONCLUSION: Normal-weight and obese participants who were consistent OCP users experienced substantial and comparable ovarian suppression during OCP use. Higher OCP failure rates among obese women reported elsewhere are thus unlikely to be attributable to physiological differences in OCP effect. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00827632. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20664386     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e79440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  19 in total

Review 1.  Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks.

Authors:  Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

2.  Pharmacokinetics and ovarian suppression during use of a contraceptive vaginal ring in normal-weight and obese women.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Anupama H Torgal; Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; Kelsey Petrie; Tiffany Thomas; Monica Dragoman; Serge Cremers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Matched-pairs analysis of ovarian suppression during oral vs. vaginal hormonal contraceptive use.

Authors:  Kelsey A Petrie; Anu H Torgal; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Concordance of self-reported hormonal contraceptive use and presence of exogenous hormones in serum among African women.

Authors:  Maria Pyra; Jairam R Lingappa; Renee Heffron; David W Erikson; Steven W Blue; Rena C Patel; Kavita Nanda; Helen Rees; Nelly R Mugo; Nicole L Davis; Athena P Kourtis; Jared M Baeten
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Weight and body composition changes during oral contraceptive use in obese and normal weight women.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Mayeda; Anupama H Torgal; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  Update on hormonal contraception and bone density.

Authors:  Michelle M Isley; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Prolonged monitoring of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel levels confirms an altered pharmacokinetic profile in obese oral contraceptives users.

Authors:  Alison B Edelman; Ganesh Cherala; Myrna Y Munar; Barent Dubois; Martha McInnis; Frank Z Stanczyk; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Contraceptive vaginal ring effectiveness is maintained during 6 weeks of use: a prospective study of normal BMI and obese women.

Authors:  Monica Dragoman; Kelsey Petrie; Anupama Torgal; Tiffany Thomas; Serge Cremers; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 9.  The creeping Pearl: Why has the rate of contraceptive failure increased in clinical trials of combined hormonal contraceptive pills?

Authors:  James Trussell; David Portman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Correcting oral contraceptive pharmacokinetic alterations due to obesity: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alison B Edelman; Ganesh Cherala; Myrna Y Munar; Martha McInnis; Frank Z Stanczyk; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.