Literature DB >> 25070547

Correcting oral contraceptive pharmacokinetic alterations due to obesity: a randomized controlled trial.

Alison B Edelman1, Ganesh Cherala2, Myrna Y Munar3, Martha McInnis4, Frank Z Stanczyk5, Jeffrey T Jensen4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if increasing the hormone dose or eliminating the hormone-free interval improves key pharmacokinetic (PK) alterations caused by obesity during oral contraceptive (OC) use. STUDY
DESIGN: Obese [body mass index (BMI)≥30 kg/m(2)], ovulatory, otherwise healthy, women received an OC containing 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE)/100 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) dosed cyclically (21 days active pills with 7-day placebo week) for two cycles and then were randomized for two additional cycles to the following: continuous cycling (CC, a dose neutral arm using the same OC with no hormone-free interval) or increased dose (ID, a dose escalation arm using an OC containing 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG cyclically). During Cycles 2, 3 and 4, outpatient visits were performed to assess maximum serum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC0-∞) and time to steady state as well as pharmacodynamics. These key PK parameters were calculated and compared within groups between baseline and treatment cycles.
RESULTS: A total of 31 women enrolled and completed the study (CC group, n=16; ID group, n=15). Demographics were similar between groups [mean BMI: CC, 38 kg/m(2) (S.D. 5.1); ID, 41 kg/m(2) (S.D. 7.6)]. At baseline, the key LNG PK parameters were no different between groups; average time to reach steady state was 12 days in both groups; Cmax were CC: 3.82±1.28 ng/mL and ID: 3.13±0.87 ng/mL; and AUC0-∞ were CC: 267±115 h ng/mL and ID: 199±75 h ng/mL. Following randomization, the CC group maintained steady-state serum levels whereas the ID group had a significantly higher Cmax (p<.001) but again required 12 days to achieve steady state. However, AUC was not significantly different between CC (412±255 h ng/mL) and ID (283±130 h ng/mL). Forty-five percent (14/31) of the study population had evidence of an active follicle-like structure prior to randomization and afterwards this decreased to 9% (3/31).
CONCLUSION: Both increasing the OC dose and continuous dosing appear to counteract the impact of obesity on key OC PK parameters. IMPLICATIONS: Obesity adversely affects the pharmacokinetics of very low dose OC pills. Although the impact of these changes on OC efficacy is still under debate, PK parameters can be normalized in obese users by continuous dosing or increasing to a low-dose pill.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Continuous dosing; Drug levels; Hormonal contraception

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25070547      PMCID: PMC4179976          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  18 in total

Review 1.  Continuation and compliance of contraceptive use.

Authors:  B Pinter
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 2.  The integration of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: understanding dose-response.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Ralph E Kauffman
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics of gestagens: some problems.

Authors:  K Fotherby
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Pharmacokinetics of single-dose levonorgestrel in adolescents.

Authors:  Nancy C Sambol; Cynthia C Harper; Lena Kim; Chui Yu Liu; Philip Darney; Tina R Raine
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Synthesis and regulation of sex hormone-binding globulin in obesity.

Authors:  A Hautanen
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-06

6.  Greater inhibition of the pituitary--ovarian axis in oral contraceptive regimens with a shortened hormone-free interval.

Authors:  Sherilyn A Willis; Thomas J Kuehl; A Michael Spiekerman; Patricia J Sulak
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  NORPLANT: levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant.

Authors:  H B Croxatto
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 8.  Levonorgestrel. Clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  K Fotherby
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Residual ovarian activity during oral steroid contraception.

Authors:  A M van Heusden; B C J M Fauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Prolonged monitoring of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel levels confirms an altered pharmacokinetic profile in obese oral contraceptives users.

Authors:  Alison B Edelman; Ganesh Cherala; Myrna Y Munar; Barent Dubois; Martha McInnis; Frank Z Stanczyk; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reduction in FSH Throughout the Menstrual Cycle After Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation in Young Normal Weight but not Obese Women.

Authors:  Jessica L Bauer; Katherine Kuhn; Andrew P Bradford; Zain A Al-Safi; Mary A Harris; Robert H Eckel; Celeste Y Robledo; Anahit Malkhasyan; Joshua Johnson; Nancy R Gee; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2019-02-17       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  How can we improve oral contraceptive success in obese women?

Authors:  Ganesh Cherala; Alison Edelman
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.045

3.  Pharmacokinetics of Hormonal Contraception in Individuals with Obesity: a Review.

Authors:  Shaalini Ramanadhan; William J Jusko; Alison Edelman
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2020-05-04

Review 4.  Clarification of contraceptive drug pharmacokinetics in obesity.

Authors:  William J Jusko
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Increased exposure of norethindrone in HIV+ women treated with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir therapy.

Authors:  Barent N DuBois; Jessica Atrio; Frank Z Stanczyk; Ganesh Cherala
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Impact of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel-based emergency contraception: single and double dosing.

Authors:  Alison B Edelman; Ganesh Cherala; Steven W Blue; David W Erikson; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Drug Dosing and Pharmacokinetics in Children With Obesity: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Margreet W Harskamp-van Ginkel; Kevin D Hill; Kristian C Becker; Kristian Becker; Daniela Testoni; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Daniel Gonzalez; Jeffrey S Barrett; Daniel K Benjamin; David A Siegel; Patricia Banks; Kevin M Watt
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 26.796

Review 8.  Hormonal contraceptives for contraception in overweight or obese women.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Mario Chen; Thomas W Grey; Conrad Otterness; Carolyn Westhoff; Alison Edelman; Frans M Helmerhorst
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-18

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and serum concentrations of progestins used in contraception.

Authors:  Alexis J Bick; Renate Louw-du Toit; Salndave B Skosana; Donita Africander; Janet P Hapgood
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 10.  Progestin-only contraceptives: effects on weight.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Shanthi Ramesh; Mario Chen; Alison Edelman; Conrad Otterness; James Trussell; Frans M Helmerhorst
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.