Literature DB >> 20664025

Comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies.

Thomas W Concannon1, David M Kent, Sharon-Lise Normand, Joseph P Newhouse, John L Griffith, Joshua Cohen, Joni R Beshansky, John B Wong, Thomas Aversano, Harry P Selker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more effective on average than fibrinolytic therapy in the treatment of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Yet, most US hospitals are not equipped for PCI, and fibrinolytic therapy is still widely used. This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies to increase the use of PCI against standard emergency transport and care. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We estimated incremental treatment costs and quality-adjusted life expectancies of 2000 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who received PCI or fibrinolytic therapy in simulations of emergency care in a regional hospital system. To increase access to PCI across the system, we compared a base case strategy with 12 hospital-based strategies of building new PCI laboratories or extending the hours of existing laboratories and 1 emergency medical services-based strategy of transporting all patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction to existing PCI-capable hospitals. The base case resulted in 609 (95% CI, 569-647) patients getting PCI. Hospital-based strategies increased the number of patients receiving PCI, the costs of care, and quality-adjusted life years saved and were cost-effective under a variety of conditions. An emergency medical services-based strategy of transporting every patient to an existing PCI facility was less costly and more effective than all hospital expansion options.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that new construction and staffing of PCI laboratories may not be warranted if an emergency medical services strategy is both available and feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20664025      PMCID: PMC2967250          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.908541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  40 in total

1.  Expert panel vs decision-analysis recommendations for postdischarge coronary angiography after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K M Kuntz; J Tsevat; M C Weinstein; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything?

Authors:  Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Eric R Bates
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Acute reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction from 1994-2003.

Authors:  Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Martha E Blaney; Susan M Morris; Lori Parsons; Dave P Miller; John G Canto; Hal V Barron; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: the emergency medical services and emergency department perspective.

Authors:  Peter Moyer; Joseph P Ornato; William J Brady; Leslie L Davis; Chris A Ghaemmaghami; W Brian Gibler; Greg Mears; Vincent N Mosesso; Richard D Zane
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparison of mortality benefit of immediate thrombolytic therapy versus delayed primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  David M Kent; Robin Ruthazer; John L Griffith; Joni R Beshansky; Cindy L Grines; Thomas Aversano; Thomas W Concannon; Robert J Zalenski; Harry P Selker
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  A cost-effective analysis of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M J de Boer; B A van Hout; A L Liem; H Suryapranata; J C Hoorntje; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3.

Authors:  W J Rogers; J G Canto; C T Lambrew; A J Tiefenbrunn; B Kinkaid; D A Shoultz; P D Frederick; N Every
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Geographic variation in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

Authors:  G T O'Connor; H B Quinton; N D Traven; L D Ramunno; T A Dodds; T A Marciniak; J E Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Primary percutaneous coronary intervention expansion to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery in Michigan: a geographic information systems analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy W Buckley; Eric R Bates; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  16 in total

1.  A percutaneous coronary intervention lab in every hospital?

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Jason Nelson; Jessica Goetz; John L Griffith
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  National performance on door-in to door-out time among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jeph Herrin; Lauren E Miller; Dima F Turkmani; Wato Nsa; Elizabeth E Drye; Susannah M Bernheim; Shari M Ling; Michael T Rapp; Lein F Han; Dale W Bratzler; Elizabeth H Bradley; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Henry H Ting; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-28

3.  Evidence of systematic duplication by new percutaneous coronary intervention programs.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Jason Nelson; David M Kent; John L Griffith
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-07-09

Review 4.  Prehospital Prediction of Large Vessel Occlusion in Suspected Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Kevin J Keenan; Charles Kircher; Jason T McMullan
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Koushik Reddy; Asma Khaliq; Robert J Henning
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-26

6.  Association of Cardiac Care Regionalization With Access, Treatment, and Mortality Among Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yu-Chu Shen; Harlan Krumholz; Renee Y Hsia
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-01

7.  Helicopter EMS: Research Endpoints and Potential Benefits.

Authors:  Stephen H Thomas; Annette O Arthur
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.112

8.  Direct emergency medical services transport in STEMI: breaking the bank for non-PCI capable hospitals?

Authors:  Jacqueline L Green; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-07-02

9.  Short term cost effectiveness of a regional myocardial infarction network.

Authors:  Ralf Birkemeyer; Anke Dauch; Alfred Müller; Manfred Beck; Henrik Schneider; Hueseyin Ince; Werner Jung; Steffen Wahler
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2013-04-08

10.  Growth in percutaneous coronary intervention capacity relative to population and disease prevalence.

Authors:  James R Langabeer; Timothy D Henry; Dean J Kereiakes; Jami Dellifraine; Jamie Emert; Zheng Wang; Leilani Stuart; Richard King; Wendy Segrest; Peter Moyer; James G Jollis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.