Literature DB >> 11127441

Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3.

W J Rogers1, J G Canto, C T Lambrew, A J Tiefenbrunn, B Kinkaid, D A Shoultz, P D Frederick, N Every.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine trends in the treatment of myocardial infarction from 1990 through 1999 in the U.S. and to relate these trends to current guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available to show how recent clinical trials and clinical guidelines have impacted treatment of myocardial infarction.
METHODS: Temporal trends in myocardial infarction treatment and outcome were assessed by using data from 1,514,292 patients in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) 1, 2 and 3 from 1990 through 1999.
RESULTS: During this interval, the use of intravenous thrombolytic therapy declined from 34.3% to 20.8%, but the use of primary angioplasty increased from 2.4% to 7.3% (both p = 0.0001). The median "door-to-drug" time among thrombolytic therapy recipients fell from 61.8 to 37.8 min (p = 0.0001), primarily owing to shorter "door-to-data" and "data-to-decision" times. The prevalence of non-Q wave infarctions increased from 45% in 1994 to 63% in 1999 (p = 0.0001). From 1994 through 1999, there was increased usage of beta-blockers, aspirin and angiotensin-converting inhibitors, both during the first 24 h after admission and on hospital discharge (all p = 0.0001). Between 1990 and 1999, the median duration of hospital stay fell from 8.3 to 4.3 days, and hospital mortality declined from 11.2% to 9.4% (both p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The NRMI data from 1990 through 1999 demonstrate that the recommendations of recent clinical trials and published guidelines are being implemented, resulting in more rapid administration of intravenous thrombolytic therapy, increasing use of primary angioplasty and more frequent use of adjunctive therapies known to reduce mortality, and may be contributing to the higher prevalence of non-Q wave infarctions, shorter hospital stays and lower hospital mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11127441     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00996-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  107 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Venu Menon; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Practising what is preached: the MINAP study.

Authors:  O C Raffel; H D White
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Improving care for patients with acute coronary syndromes: initial results from the National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project (MINAP).

Authors:  J S Birkhead; L Walker; M Pearson; C Weston; A D Cunningham; A F Rickards
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Role of nuclear cardiac imaging in myocardial infarction: postinfarction risk stratification.

Authors:  John J Mahmarian; Girish Dwivedi; Tultul Lahiri
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Acute coronary syndrome in oman: results from the gulf registry of acute coronary events.

Authors:  Prashanth Panduranga; Kadhim Sulaiman; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-08-15

7.  Access to cardiac interventional services in Alabama and Mississippi: a geographical information system analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Ann Graves
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2010-04-01

8.  Long-term trends in myocardial infarction incidence and case fatality in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart study.

Authors:  Nisha I Parikh; Philimon Gona; Martin G Larson; Caroline S Fox; Emelia J Benjamin; Joanne M Murabito; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002.

Authors:  Viola Vaccarino; Saif S Rathore; Nanette K Wenger; Paul D Frederick; Jerome L Abramson; Hal V Barron; Ajay Manhapra; Susmita Mallik; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Long-term trends in the incidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Raghava S Velagaleti; Michael J Pencina; Joanne M Murabito; Thomas J Wang; Nisha I Parikh; Ralph B D'Agostino; Daniel Levy; William B Kannel; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.