Literature DB >> 18371474

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention expansion to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery in Michigan: a geographic information systems analysis.

Jeremy W Buckley1, Eric R Bates, Brahmajee K Nallamothu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2005, Michigan expanded primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) capability to 12 hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery. We determined the potential impact of this expansion on geographic access to P-PCI for patients.
METHODS: Geographic information systems using the US Census Survey and hospital data from the state of Michigan were used to construct maps with 20-mile hospital service areas around P-PCI hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery. Geographic access was calculated as the percentage of the population living within the hospital service areas of these 2 types of hospitals.
RESULTS: Of 9,938,444 persons in Michigan, 7,694,834 (77.4%) lived within 20 miles of a P-PCI hospital. Thirty centers with on-site cardiac surgery provided access for 7,219,995 persons (72.6%). The 12 P-PCI hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery increased access by 474,839 persons (4.8%). Of these, 3 geographically isolated facilities, which were at least 20 miles away from another P-PCI hospital, accounted for the greatest improvement in geographic access (n = 425,700 [4.3%]), whereas the remaining 9 hospitals increased access by only 49,139 persons (0.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Expansion of P-PCI to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery in Michigan improved geographic access to a modest extent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18371474     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  8 in total

1.  A percutaneous coronary intervention lab in every hospital?

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Jason Nelson; Jessica Goetz; John L Griffith
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention without onsite surgical backup.

Authors:  Gregory J Dehmer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Evidence of systematic duplication by new percutaneous coronary intervention programs.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Jason Nelson; David M Kent; John L Griffith
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-07-09

4.  Comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; David M Kent; Sharon-Lise Normand; Joseph P Newhouse; John L Griffith; Joshua Cohen; Joni R Beshansky; John B Wong; Thomas Aversano; Harry P Selker
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-07-27

5.  Expansion of invasive cardiac services in the United States.

Authors:  Jill R Horwitz; Austin Nichols; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Comilla Sasson; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Growth in percutaneous coronary intervention capacity relative to population and disease prevalence.

Authors:  James R Langabeer; Timothy D Henry; Dean J Kereiakes; Jami Dellifraine; Jamie Emert; Zheng Wang; Leilani Stuart; Richard King; Wendy Segrest; Peter Moyer; James G Jollis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 7.  Recent Advances in the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Mun K Hong
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-09-16

8.  Characteristics of Early and Late Adopting Hospitals Providing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Taiwan.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsueh Lu; Yu-Tung Huang; Jo-Chi Lee; Li-Tan Yang; Fu-Wen Liang; Wei-Hsian Yin; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.