Literature DB >> 20662931

Linking bacterial identities and ecosystem processes: can 'omic' analyses be more than the sum of their parts?

Sergio E Morales1, William E Holben.   

Abstract

A major goal in microbial ecology is to link specific microbial populations to environmental processes (e.g. biogeochemical transformations). The cultivation and characterization of isolates using genetic, biochemical and physiological tests provided direct links between organisms and their activities, but did not provide an understanding of the process networks in situ. Cultivation-independent molecular techniques have extended capabilities in this regard, and yet, for two decades, the focus has been on monitoring microbial community diversity and population dynamics by means of rRNA gene abundances or rRNA molecules. However, these approaches are not always well suited for establishing metabolic activity or microbial roles in ecosystem function. The current approaches, microbial community metagenomic and metatranscriptomic techniques, have been developed as other ways to study microbial assemblages, giving rise to exponentially increasing collections of information from numerous environments. This review considers some advantages and limitations of nucleic acid-based 'omic' approaches and discusses the potential for the integration of multiple molecular or computational techniques for a more effective assessment of links between specific microbial populations and ecosystem processes in situ. Establishing such connections will enhance the predictive power regarding ecosystem response to parameters or perturbations, and will bring us closer to integrating microbial data into ecosystem- and global-scale process measurements and models.
© 2010 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20662931     DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00938.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  32 in total

1.  Characterization and identification of productivity-associated rhizobacteria in wheat.

Authors:  Michael Anderson; Joshua Habiger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property.

Authors:  Michael W I Schmidt; Margaret S Torn; Samuel Abiven; Thorsten Dittmar; Georg Guggenberger; Ivan A Janssens; Markus Kleber; Ingrid Kögel-Knabner; Johannes Lehmann; David A C Manning; Paolo Nannipieri; Daniel P Rasse; Steve Weiner; Susan E Trumbore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Microbial Surface Colonization and Biofilm Development in Marine Environments.

Authors:  Hongyue Dang; Charles R Lovell
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Linking microbial community structure to β-glucosidic function in soil aggregates.

Authors:  Vanessa L Bailey; Sarah J Fansler; James C Stegen; Lee Ann McCue
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Effect of physical sediments reworking on hydrocarbon degradation and bacterial community structure in marine coastal sediments.

Authors:  Robert Duran; Patricia Bonin; Ronan Jezequel; Karine Dubosc; Claire Gassie; Fanny Terrisse; Justine Abella; Christine Cagnon; Cecile Militon; Valérie Michotey; Franck Gilbert; Philippe Cuny; Cristiana Cravo-Laureau
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Dispersing misconceptions and identifying opportunities for the use of 'omics' in soil microbial ecology.

Authors:  James I Prosser
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 60.633

7.  Principal methods for isolation and identification of soil microbial communities.

Authors:  Christos Stefanis; Athanasios Alexopoulos; Chrissa Voidarou; Stavros Vavias; Eugenia Bezirtzoglou
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.099

8.  Effects of sample treatments on genome recovery via single-cell genomics.

Authors:  Scott Clingenpeel; Patrick Schwientek; Philip Hugenholtz; Tanja Woyke
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Are multi-omics enough?

Authors:  Cristina Vilanova; Manuel Porcar
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 17.745

Review 10.  Stable isotope probing in the metagenomics era: a bridge towards improved bioremediation.

Authors:  Ondrej Uhlik; Mary-Cathrine Leewis; Michal Strejcek; Lucie Musilova; Martina Mackova; Mary Beth Leigh; Tomas Macek
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 14.227

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.