David Hallifax1, Joanne A Foster, J Brian Houston. 1. Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. David.Hallifax@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide a definitive assessment of prediction of in vivo CL (int) from human liver in vitro systems for assessment of typical underprediction. METHODS: A database of published predictions of clearance from human hepatocytes and liver microsomes was compiled, including only intravenous CL (b). The influence of liver model (well-stirred (WS) or parallel tube (PT)), plasma protein binding and clearance level on the relationship between in vitro and in vivo CL (int) was examined. RESULTS: Average prediction bias was about 5- and 4-fold for microsomes and hepatocytes, respectively. Reduced bias using the PT model, in preference to the popular WS model, was only marginal across a wide range of clearance with a consequential minor impact on prediction. Increasing underprediction with decreasing fu (b), or increasing CL (int), was found only for hepatocytes, suggesting fundamental in vitro artefacts rather than failure to model potentially unequilibrated binding during rapid extraction. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to microsomes, hepatocytes give a disproportionate prediction with increasing clearance suggesting limitations either at the active site, such as cofactor exhaustion, or with intracellular concentration equilibrium, such as rate-limiting cell permeability. A simple log linear empirical relationship can be used to correct hepatocyte predictions.
PURPOSE: To provide a definitive assessment of prediction of in vivo CL (int) from human liver in vitro systems for assessment of typical underprediction. METHODS: A database of published predictions of clearance from human hepatocytes and liver microsomes was compiled, including only intravenous CL (b). The influence of liver model (well-stirred (WS) or parallel tube (PT)), plasma protein binding and clearance level on the relationship between in vitro and in vivo CL (int) was examined. RESULTS: Average prediction bias was about 5- and 4-fold for microsomes and hepatocytes, respectively. Reduced bias using the PT model, in preference to the popular WS model, was only marginal across a wide range of clearance with a consequential minor impact on prediction. Increasing underprediction with decreasing fu (b), or increasing CL (int), was found only for hepatocytes, suggesting fundamental in vitro artefacts rather than failure to model potentially unequilibrated binding during rapid extraction. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to microsomes, hepatocytes give a disproportionate prediction with increasing clearance suggesting limitations either at the active site, such as cofactor exhaustion, or with intracellular concentration equilibrium, such as rate-limiting cell permeability. A simple log linear empirical relationship can be used to correct hepatocyte predictions.
Authors: Nicola J Hewitt; María José Gómez Lechón; J Brian Houston; David Hallifax; Hayley S Brown; Patrick Maurel; J Gerald Kenna; Lena Gustavsson; Christina Lohmann; Christian Skonberg; Andre Guillouzo; Gregor Tuschl; Albert P Li; Edward LeCluyse; Geny M M Groothuis; Jan G Hengstler Journal: Drug Metab Rev Date: 2007 Impact factor: 4.518
Authors: Nancy Hakooz; Kiyomi Ito; Helen Rawden; Helen Gill; Lynn Lemmers; Alan R Boobis; Robert J Edwards; David J Carlile; Brian G Lake; J Brian Houston Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Dermot F McGinnity; George Zhang; Jane R Kenny; Geraldine A Hamilton; Sara Otmani; Karen R Stams; Suzzette Haney; Patrick Brassil; David M Stresser; Robert J Riley Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Nisha S Sipes; John F Wambaugh; Robert Pearce; Scott S Auerbach; Barbara A Wetmore; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Andrew J Shapiro; Daniel Svoboda; Michael J DeVito; Stephen S Ferguson Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Nikolaos Tsamandouras; Wen Li Kelly Chen; Collin D Edington; Cynthia L Stokes; Linda G Griffith; Murat Cirit Journal: AAPS J Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 4.009