Literature DB >> 9394025

Nonspecific binding to microsomes: impact on scale-up of in vitro intrinsic clearance to hepatic clearance as assessed through examination of warfarin, imipramine, and propranolol.

R S Obach1.   

Abstract

The nonspecific, noncovalent binding of three drugs, imipramine, warfarin, and propranolol, to pooled human and animal liver microsomes has been determined using equilibrium dialysis in conditions where no cofactor (NADPH) was included in the incubation. The binding of warfarin was dependent upon both protein and drug concentration, whereas the binding of propranolol and imipramine was also dependent upon protein concentration but generally independent of drug concentration. At a microsomal protein concentration of 1.0 mg/ml and a warfarin concentration of 10 microM, the free fraction (fu(mic)) was 0.85. The corresponding values for propranolol and imipramine were 0.41 and 0.16, respectively. Thus, although all three drugs exhibit high binding in plasma (fu<0.1) the acidic drug warfarin differs from the basic drugs propranolol and imipramine in the extent to which each binds to microsomal protein. The binding of all three drugs to liver microsomes obtained from commonly studied animal species (rat, dog, and monkey) was almost identical to that observed in human. Additionally, the binding of warfarin and propranolol to microsomes obtained from insect cells used in baculovirus cytochrome P450 expression systems was similar to that exhibited in liver microsomes, when equal protein concentrations were compared. The enzyme kinetics of propranolol, imipramine, and warfarin oxidative metabolism were determined in pooled human liver microsomes, and the intrinsic clearance values obtained were used in scaling up to project human in vivo clearance. The values obtained by incorporating microsomal binding were compared with those in which this factor is ignored. The findings suggest that the parameter fu(mic) is important to obtain when attempting to relate in vitro intrinsic clearance to in vivo clearance. Also, this value is important to consider when comparing substrates with respect to enzyme specificity, since measured apparent KM values should be converted to true "free KM" values by correcting for the free fraction in the in vitro incubation. Furthermore, the extent of nonspecific binding to microsomes is likely an important parameter to consider when attempting to relate Ki values measured in vitro to observations of drug-drug interactions (or the lack thereof) in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9394025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  35 in total

1.  Rapidly distinguishing reversible and irreversible CYP450 inhibitors by using fluorometric kinetic analyses.

Authors:  Z Yan; B Rafferty; G W Caldwell; J A Masucci
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Prediction of human metabolic clearance from in vitro systems: retrospective analysis and prospective view.

Authors:  David Hallifax; Joanne A Foster; J Brian Houston
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance.

Authors:  K Venkatakrishnan; L L von Moltke; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A novel strategy for physiologically based predictions of human pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Hannah M Jones; Neil Parrott; Karin Jorga; Thierry Lavé
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Multi-functional scaling methodology for translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic applications using integrated microphysiological systems (MPS).

Authors:  Christian Maass; Cynthia L Stokes; Linda G Griffith; Murat Cirit
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 6.  Prediction of hepatic clearance in human from in vitro data for successful drug development.

Authors:  Masato Chiba; Yasuyuki Ishii; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 7.  Modeling kinetics of subcellular disposition of chemicals.

Authors:  Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Expression levels and activation of a PXR variant are directly related to drug resistance in osteosarcoma cell lines.

Authors:  Edith J Mensah-Osman; Dafydd G Thomas; Michelle M Tabb; Jose M Larios; Dennis P Hughes; Thomas J Giordano; Michelle L Lizyness; James M Rae; Bruce Blumberg; Paul F Hollenberg; Laurence H Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Quantitative drug interactions prediction system (Q-DIPS): a dynamic computer-based method to assist in the choice of clinically relevant in vivo studies.

Authors:  P Bonnabry; J Sievering; T Leemann; P Dayer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA): a new biological response modifier for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Shufeng Zhou; Philip Kestell; Bruce C Baguley; James W Paxton
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.