Literature DB >> 9516923

Phase II trial of topotecan administered as 72-hour continuous infusion in children with refractory solid tumors: a collaborative Pediatric Branch, National Cancer Institute, and Children's Cancer Group Study.

S M Blaney1, M N Needle, A Gillespie, J K Sato, G H Reaman, S L Berg, P C Adamson, M D Krailo, W A Bleyer, D G Poplack, F M Balis.   

Abstract

The antitumor activity of topotecan administered as a 72-h continuous i.v. infusion was evaluated in children with refractory neuroblastoma and sarcomas of soft tissue and bone. We also attempted to increase the dose intensity of topotecan by including an intrapatient dose escalation in the trial design. Ninety-three children (85 eligible and evaluable for response) with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, or other soft-tissue sarcomas received topotecan administered as a 72-h i.v. infusion every 21 days. The initial dose was 1.0 mg/m2/day, with subsequent intrapatient dose escalation to 1.3 mg/m2/day for those patients who did not experience dose-limiting toxicity after their first cycle of topotecan. There was one complete response in a patient with neuroblastoma (n = 26) and one partial response in a patient with Ewing's sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (n = 25). No complete or partial responses were observed in 17 patients with osteosarcoma, 15 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, or 2 patients with other soft-tissue sarcomas; however, 8 patients had prolonged (15-48 weeks) stable disease while receiving topotecan. Topotecan was well tolerated. The most commonly observed toxicities were myelosuppression (dose-limiting) and nausea and vomiting. Intrapatient dose escalations were performed in 68% of the patients who received more than one cycle of topotecan, and 1.3 mg/m2/day was tolerated by 79% of the patients who received the higher dose and were evaluable for hematological toxicity. In conclusion, topotecan administered as a 72-h continuous infusion every 21 days is inactive (objective response rate, < 20%) in children with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma and sarcomas of soft tissue or bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9516923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenomics of second-line drugs used for treatment of unresponsive or relapsed osteosarcoma patients.

Authors:  Claudia M Hattinger; Serena Vella; Elisa Tavanti; Marilù Fanelli; Piero Picci; Massimo Serra
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent or progressive central nervous system tumors - a pediatric oncology group phase II study.

Authors:  R P Kadota; C F Stewart; M Horn; J F Kuttesch; P C Burger; J L Kepner; L E Kun; H S Friedman; R L Heideman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Topotecan plus cyclophosphamide in adults with relapsed or refractory pediatric-type sarcoma: a retrospective analysis from the German Sarcoma Medical Oncology Group (AIO).

Authors:  Jörg Thomas Hartmann; R D Issels; K San Nicolo; V Grünwald; B Hertenstein; E Papesch; S Krause; I Sturm
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Phase II randomized comparison of topotecan plus cyclophosphamide versus topotecan alone in children with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Wendy B London; Christopher N Frantz; Laura A Campbell; Robert C Seeger; Babette A Brumback; Susan L Cohn; Katherine K Matthay; Robert P Castleberry; Lisa Diller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (TCE) in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of a phase-II trial.

Authors:  Thorsten Simon; Alfred Längler; Urs Harnischmacher; Michael C Frühwald; Norbert Jorch; Alexander Claviez; Frank Berthold; Barbara Hero
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Comprehensive analysis of published phase I/II clinical trials between 1990-2010 in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma confirms limited outcomes and need for translational investment.

Authors:  Annemiek M van Maldegem; Aparna Bhosale; Hans J Gelderblom; Pancras Cw Hogendoorn; Andrew B Hassan
Journal:  Clin Sarcoma Res       Date:  2012-01-27

Review 7.  Prospects and challenges for the development of new therapies for Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Patrick J Grohar; Lee J Helman
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Camptothecin-based regimens for treatment of ewing sarcoma: past studies and future directions.

Authors:  Lars Wagner
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2011-04-06

9.  A Phase II Study of Docetaxel in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Ewing's Tumours.

Authors:  T Meyer; A McTiernan; J Whelan
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2003

Review 10.  Osteosarcoma in Korean children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jun Ah Lee
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.