Literature DB >> 20660434

Effect of gender, age and deprivation on key performance indicators in a FOBT-based colorectal screening programme.

R J C Steele1, I Kostourou, P McClements, C Watling, G Libby, D Weller, D H Brewster, R Black, F A Carey, C Fraser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of gender, age and deprivation on key performance indicators in a colorectal cancer screening programme.
SETTING: Between March 2000 and May 2006 a demonstration pilot of biennial guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) colorectal screening was carried out in North-East Scotland for all individuals aged 50-69 years.
METHODS: The relevant populations were subdivided, by gender, into four age groups and into five deprivation categories according to the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), and key performance indicators analysed within these groups.
RESULTS: In all rounds, uptake of the gFOBT increased with age (P < 0.001), decreased with increasing deprivation in both genders (P < 0.001), and was consistently higher in women than in men in all age and all SIMD groups. In addition, increasing deprivation was negatively associated with uptake of colonoscopy in men with a positive gFOBT (P < 0.001) although this effect was not observed in women. Positivity rates increased with age (P < 0.001) and increasing deprivation (P < 0.001) in both genders in all rounds, although they were higher in men than in women for all age and SIMD categories. Cancer detection rates increased with age (P < 0.001), were higher in men than in women in all age and SIMD categories, but were not consistently related to deprivation. In both genders, the positive predictive value (PPV) for cancer increased with age (P < 0.001) and decreased with increasing deprivation (P < 0.001) in all rounds and was consistently higher in men than in women in all age and SIMD categories.
CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based colorectal screening programme gender, age, and deprivation had marked effects on key performance indicators, and this has implications both for the evaluation of screening programmes and for strategies designed to reduce inequalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660434     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2010.009120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  35 in total

Review 1.  Faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: the past or the future.

Authors:  Sally C Benton; Helen E Seaman; Stephen P Halloran
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

2.  Challenges and Approaches to Measuring Repeat Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Ethan A Halm; Celette Sugg Skinner; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Interval cancers in a national colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Robert Jc Steele; Greig Stanners; Jaroslaw Lang; David H Brewster; Francis A Carey; Callum G Fraser
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Effect of repeated invitations on uptake of colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: analysis of prevalence and incidence screening.

Authors:  R J C Steele; I Kostourou; P McClements; C Watling; G Libby; D Weller; D H Brewster; R Black; F A Carey; C Fraser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-27

5.  Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Michael P Garcia; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Yingye Zheng; Douglas A Corley; Ethan A Halm; Amit G Singal; Carrie N Klabunde; Chyke A Doubeni; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Joanne E Schottinger; Beverly B Green; Virginia P Quinn; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Virginia P Quinn; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jeffrey K Lee; Joanne E Schottinger; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Nirupa R Ghai; Alexander T Lee; Richard Contreras; Charles P Quesenberry; Bruce H Fireman; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests.

Authors:  Richard F A Logan; Julietta Patnick; Claire Nickerson; Lynn Coleman; Matt D Rutter; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The impact of age, sex and socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in a colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  David Mansouri; Donald C McMillan; Yasmin Grant; Emilia M Crighton; Paul G Horgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Socioeconomic variation in uptake of colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test result: a retrospective analysis of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  S Morris; G Baio; E Kendall; C von Wagner; J Wardle; W Atkin; S P Halloran; G Handley; R F Logan; A Obichere; S Rainbow; S Smith; J Snowball; R Raine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Clinical outcomes using a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin as a first-line test in a national programme constrained by colonoscopy capacity.

Authors:  Robert Jc Steele; Paula J McDonald; Jayne Digby; Linda Brownlee; Judith A Strachan; Gillian Libby; Paula L McClements; Janice Birrell; Francis A Carey; Robert H Diament; Margaret Balsitis; Callum G Fraser
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.