Literature DB >> 27536369

Interval cancers in a national colorectal cancer screening programme.

Robert Jc Steele1, Greig Stanners2, Jaroslaw Lang2, David H Brewster3, Francis A Carey4, Callum G Fraser1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about interval cancers (ICs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify IC characteristics and compare these with screen-detected cancers (SCs) and cancers in non-participants (NPCs) over the same time period.
DESIGN: This was an observational study done in the first round of the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme. All individuals (772,790), aged 50-74 years, invited to participate between 1 January 2007 and 31 May 2009 were studied by linking their screening records with confirmed CRC records in the Scottish Cancer Registry (SCR). Characteristics of SC, IC and NPC were determined.
RESULTS: There were 555 SCs, 502 ICs and 922 NPCs. SCs were at an earlier stage than ICs and NPCs (33.9% Dukes' A as against 18.7% in IC and 11.3% in NPC), screening preferentially detected cancers in males (64.7% as against 52.8% in IC and 59.7% in NPC): this was independent of a different cancer site distribution in males and females. SC in the colon were less advanced than IC, but not in the rectum.
CONCLUSION: ICs account for 47.5% of the CRCs in the screened population, indicating approximately 50% screening test sensitivity: guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) sensitivity is less for women than for men and gFOBT screening may not be effective for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; faecal occult blood test; interval cancer; non-participant cancer; screen-detected cancer

Year:  2016        PMID: 27536369      PMCID: PMC4971793          DOI: 10.1177/2050640615624294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  16 in total

1.  Faecal haemoglobin concentrations by gender and age: implications for population-based screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paula J McDonald; Judith A Strachan; Jayne Digby; Robert J C Steele; Callum G Fraser
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Interval cancers in a FOBT-based colorectal cancer population screening programme: implications for stage, gender and tumour site.

Authors:  R J C Steele; P McClements; C Watling; G Libby; D Weller; D H Brewster; R Black; F A Carey; C G Fraser
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update.

Authors:  Paul Hewitson; Paul Glasziou; Eila Watson; Bernie Towler; Les Irwig
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Completeness of case ascertainment in a Scottish regional cancer registry for the year 1992.

Authors:  D H Brewster; J Crichton; J C Harvey; G Dawson
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  Change towards earlier stage at presentation of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M H Robinson; W M Thomas; J D Hardcastle; J Chamberlain; C M Mangham
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Experience with a two-tier reflex gFOBT/FIT strategy in a national bowel screening programme.

Authors:  Callum G Fraser; Jayne Digby; Paula J McDonald; Judith A Strachan; Francis A Carey; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBT screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R J C Steele; P L McClements; G Libby; R Black; C Morton; J Birrell; N A G Mowat; J A Wilson; M Kenicer; F A Carey; C G Fraser
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Gender differences in colorectal cancer: implications for age at initiation of screening.

Authors:  H Brenner; M Hoffmeister; V Arndt; U Haug
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Deprivation and faecal haemoglobin: implications for bowel cancer screening.

Authors:  Jayne Digby; Paula J McDonald; Judith A Strachan; Gillian Libby; Robert J C Steele; Callum G Fraser
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  4 in total

1.  Colorectal and interval cancers of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in the Basque Country (Spain).

Authors:  Isabel Portillo; Eunate Arana-Arri; Isabel Idigoras; Isabel Bilbao; Lorea Martínez-Indart; Luis Bujanda; Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Interval cancers after negative immunochemical test compared to screen and non-responders' detected cancers in Slovenian colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Dominika Novak Mlakar; Tatjana Kofol Bric; Ana Lucija Škrjanec; Mateja Krajc
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers in England: Associations with lifestyle and other factors in women in a large UK prospective cohort.

Authors:  Roger Blanks; Andrea Burón Pust; Rupert Alison; Emily He; Isobel Barnes; Julietta Patnick; Gillian K Reeves; Sarah Floud; Valerie Beral; Jane Green
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Faecal haemoglobin concentrations in women and men diagnosed with colorectal cancer in a national screening programme.

Authors:  Gavin Rc Clark; Jayne Digby; Callum G Fraser; Judith A Strachan; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.136

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.