Literature DB >> 20658093

Effect of auditory training on the middle latency response in children with (central) auditory processing disorder.

E Schochat1, F E Musiek, R Alonso, J Ogata.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the middle latency response (MLR) characteristics (latency and amplitude) in children with (central) auditory processing disorder [(C)APD], categorized as such by their performance on the central auditory test battery, and the effects of these characteristics after auditory training. Thirty children with (C)APD, 8 to 14 years of age, were tested using the MLR-evoked potential. This group was then enrolled in an 8-week auditory training program and then retested at the completion of the program. A control group of 22 children without (C)APD, composed of relatives and acquaintances of those involved in the research, underwent the same testing at equal time intervals, but were not enrolled in the auditory training program. Before auditory training, MLR results for the (C)APD group exhibited lower C3-A1 and C3-A2 wave amplitudes in comparison to the control group [C3-A1, 0.84 microV (mean), 0.39 (SD--standard deviation) for the (C)APD group and 1.18 microV (mean), 0.65 (SD) for the control group; C3-A2, 0.69 microV (mean), 0.31 (SD) for the (C)APD group and 1.00 microV (mean), 0.46 (SD) for the control group]. After training, the MLR C3-A1 [1.59 microV (mean), 0.82 (SD)] and C3-A2 [1.24 microV (mean), 0.73 (SD)] wave amplitudes of the (C)APD group significantly increased, so that there was no longer a significant difference in MLR amplitude between (C)APD and control groups. These findings suggest progress in the use of electrophysiological measurements for the diagnosis and treatment of (C)APD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658093     DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res        ISSN: 0100-879X            Impact factor:   2.590


  8 in total

1.  Auditory Training for Central Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weihing; Gail D Chermak; Frank E Musiek
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

2.  Binaural Interaction Component of Middle Latency Response in Children Suspected to Central Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi; Yones Lotfi; Abdollah Moosavi; Enayatollah Bakhshi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-04-06

3.  Auditory Lateralization Training Effects on Binaural Interaction Component of Middle Latency Response in Children Suspected to Central Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  Yones Lotfi; Abdollah Moosavi; Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi; Enayatollah Bakhshi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-02

4.  Auditory event-related potentials and function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in children with auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Thierry Morlet; Kyoko Nagao; L Ashleigh Greenwood; R Matthew Cardinale; Rebecca G Gaffney; Tammy Riegner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  [Diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in children].

Authors:  M Ptok; S Miller; D Kühn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Effects of different types of auditory temporal training on language skills: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cristina Ferraz Borges Murphy; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms.

Authors:  Martin Pienkowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The efficacy of formal auditory training in children with (central) auditory processing disorder: behavioral and electrophysiological evaluation.

Authors:  Renata Alonso; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.