Literature DB >> 20657728

A DEMONSTRATION OF A PRESURGICAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE EVALUATION FOR CATEGORIZING PATIENTS FOR IMPLANTABLE THERAPIES: A PRELIMINARY STUDY.

Kimberly Gardner Schocket1, Robert J Gatchel, Anna Wright Stowell, Martin Deschner, Richard Robinson, Leland Lou, Tony Whitworth, Dana Bernstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of a presurgical behavioral medicine evaluation (PBME) screening algorithm with patients undergoing evaluation for implantable pain management devices.
METHODS: Sixty patients were evaluated for prognostic recommendations regarding outcomes from surgery for spinal cord stimulators and intrathecal pumps. Diagnostic interviews, review of medical charts, and psychosocial and functional measures were used in the initial evaluation.
RESULTS: Patients were classified into one of four prognostic groups, from low to increasing risks: Green, Yellow-I, Yellow-II, and Red. The Green group showed the most positive biopsychosocial profile, while the Red groups showed the worst profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that the PBME algorithm may be an effective method for categorizing patients into prognostic groups. Psychological and adverse clinical features appear to have the most power in the classification of such patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 20657728      PMCID: PMC2909129          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2008.00171.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  21 in total

1.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

2.  Spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy.

Authors:  M A Kemler; G A Barendse; M van Kleef; H C de Vet; C P Rijks; C A Furnée; F A van den Wildenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Evaluation of patients for implantable pain modalities: medical and behavioral assessment.

Authors:  J Prager; M Jacobs
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Treatment Helpfulness Questionnaire: a measure of patient satisfaction with treatment modalities provided in chronic pain management programs.

Authors:  S L Chapman; R N Jamison; S H Sanders
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Personality factors and results of lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  E L Cashion; W J Lynch
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  The million visual analog scale: its utility for predicting tertiary rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher Anagnostis; Tom G Mayer; Robert J Gatchel; Timothy J Proctor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Development of a self-report screening instrument for assessing potential opioid medication misuse in chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Laura L Adams; Robert J Gatchel; Richard C Robinson; Peter Polatin; Noor Gajraj; Martin Deschner; Carl Noe
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Elective discectomy for herniation of a lumbar disc. Additional experience with an objective method.

Authors:  D M Spengler; E A Ouellette; M Battié; J Zeh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Spinal cord stimulation in Belgium: a nation-wide survey on the incidence, indications and therapeutic efficacy by the health insurer.

Authors:  R C Kupers; R Van den Oever; B Van Houdenhove; W Vanmechelen; B Hepp; B Nuttin; J M Gybels
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain.

Authors:  C G Greenough; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.