Literature DB >> 11587110

Evaluation of patients for implantable pain modalities: medical and behavioral assessment.

J Prager1, M Jacobs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in neurobiology serve as the basis for current and evolving implantable pain modalities, consisting of neurostimulation and neuraxial drug administration systems. Appropriate treatment of pain begins with an accurate diagnosis based on thorough physical and behavioral evaluations. MEASURES: The medical evaluation includes a review of the patient's medical history, diagnostic studies, physical examination, complete diagnostic workup, and screening trial of the proposed implantable therapy. The behavioral evaluation includes a review of the patient's history and medical records, clinical interview, mental status examination, psychological testing, and determination of suitability for implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic pain are subject to neurophysiological, emotional, and behavioral influences that govern their perception of pain and of pain relief. Therefore, treatment of chronic pain is multidisciplinary, drawing on cognitive and behavioral psychological therapies, functional rehabilitation, orthopedic and neurologic surgery, medications, nerve blockade, neuroaugmentative procedures, and sometimes neurodestructive procedures. Appropriate selection of patients helps ensure that implantable therapies are used for those who are most likely to benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11587110     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200109000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  8 in total

Review 1.  The psychiatric management of end-of-life pain and associated psychiatric comorbidity.

Authors:  B Eliot Cole
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2003-04

2.  Interventional pain medicine: retreat from the biopsychosocial model of pain.

Authors:  Randy S Roth; Michael E Geisser; David A Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Treatment of a Large Cohort of Veterans Experiencing Musculoskeletal Disorders with Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Veterans Health Administration: Veteran Characteristics and Outcomes.

Authors:  Laura D Wandner; Brenda T Fenton; Joseph L Goulet; Constance M Carroll; Alicia Heapy; Diana M Higgins; Matthew J Bair; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Robert D Kerns
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-03-01

5.  The association of presurgery psychological symptoms with postsurgery pain among cancer patients receiving implantable devices for pain management.

Authors:  Carrie J Aigner; Mike Hernandez; Lakshmi Koyyalagunta; Diane Novy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  A DEMONSTRATION OF A PRESURGICAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE EVALUATION FOR CATEGORIZING PATIENTS FOR IMPLANTABLE THERAPIES: A PRELIMINARY STUDY.

Authors:  Kimberly Gardner Schocket; Robert J Gatchel; Anna Wright Stowell; Martin Deschner; Richard Robinson; Leland Lou; Tony Whitworth; Dana Bernstein
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 7.  Intrathecal analgesic drug therapy.

Authors:  Alan Farrow-Gillespie; Kimberly M Kaplan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2006-02

Review 8.  Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Interventional Pain Management in Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Sushma Bhatnagar; Maynak Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2015 May-Aug
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.