Literature DB >> 20656100

Food label use and its relation to dietary intake among US adults.

Nicholas Jay Ollberding1, Randi L Wolf, Isobel Contento.   

Abstract

Rates of diet-related chronic disease combined with the lack of current data on patterns of food label use by the US population warrant re-examination of the use and potential influence of this public health tool. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of food label use and the association between food label use and nutrient intake in a nationally representative sample of US adults who participated in the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Data on food label use were collected during the interview portion of the survey, and nutrient intake was estimated using the average of two 24-hour dietary recalls. In this sample, 61.6% of participants reported using the Nutrition Facts panel, 51.6% looked at the list of ingredients, 47.2% looked at serving size, and 43.8% reviewed health claims at least sometimes when deciding to purchase a food product. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in food label use across all demographic characteristics examined. Significant differences (P<0.05) in mean nutrient intake of total energy, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, dietary fiber, and sugars were observed between food label users and non-users with label users reporting healthier nutrient consumption. The greatest differences observed were for total energy and fat and for use of specific nutrient information on the food label. Despite food label use being associated with improved dietary factors, label use alone is not expected to be sufficient in modifying behavior ultimately leading to improved health outcomes. 2010 American Dietetic Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20656100     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  39 in total

1.  The Revised Nutrition Facts Label: A Step Forward and More Room for Improvement.

Authors:  Vasanti S Malik; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The efficacy of calorie labelling formats on pre-packaged foods: An experimental study among adolescents and young adults in Canada.

Authors:  Rachel B Acton; Lana Vanderlee; Christine White; David Hammond
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2016-10-20

3.  Population approaches to improve diet, physical activity, and smoking habits: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Ashkan Afshin; Neal L Benowitz; Vera Bittner; Stephen R Daniels; Harold A Franch; David R Jacobs; William E Kraus; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Debra A Krummel; Barry M Popkin; Laurie P Whitsel; Neil A Zakai
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Nutrition Facts Panel use is associated with diet quality and dietary patterns among Latinos with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Grace Kollannoor-Samuel; Sofia Segura-Pérez; Fatma M Shebl; Nicola L Hawley; Grace Damio; Jyoti Chhabra; Sonia Vega-López; Maria Luz Fernandez; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Consumption of added sugars among US children and adults by food purchase location and food source.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; Colin D Rehm
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Nutrition Facts Use in Relation to Eating Behaviors and Healthy and Unhealthy Weight Control Behaviors.

Authors:  Mary J Christoph; Katie A Loth; Marla E Eisenberg; Ann F Haynos; Nicole Larson; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.045

7.  Does Pregnancy Increase Use and Awareness of Nutrition Information in Food Labels?

Authors:  Juhee Kim; Satomi Imai; Holly Mathews
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-06

8.  A traffic light food labeling intervention increases consumer awareness of health and healthy choices at the point-of-purchase.

Authors:  Lillian Sonnenberg; Emily Gelsomin; Douglas E Levy; Jason Riis; Susan Barraclough; Anne N Thorndike
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  The Fit for Delivery study: rationale for the recommendations and test-retest reliability of a dietary score measuring adherence to 10 specific recommendations for prevention of excessive weight gain during pregnancy.

Authors:  Nina C Øverby; Elisabet R Hillesund; Linda R Sagedal; Ingvild Vistad; Elling Bere
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  The Design of a Mobile Portion Size Estimation Interface for a Low Literacy Population.

Authors:  Beenish Chaudry; Kay Connelly; Katie A Siek; Janet L Welch
Journal:  Int Conf Pervasive Comput Technol Healthc       Date:  2011-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.