OBJECTIVE: The study aims were to (i) identify determinants of Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) use and (ii) describe the association between NFP use and dietary intake among Latinos with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Baseline cross-sectional data from a clinical trial were used to assess the association between NFP use and dietary intake. Diet was measured using two methods: (i) a diet quality score (the Healthy Eating Index-2010) derived from a single 24 h recall and (ii) dietary pattern (exploratory factor analyses) from an FFQ. Multivariable logistic and non-parametric quantile regressions were conducted, as appropriate. Settings Hartford County, Connecticut, USA. SUBJECTS: Latino adults (n 203), ≥21 years of age, with diagnosed type 2 diabetes, glycosylated Hb≥7 %, and without medical conditions limiting physical activity. RESULTS: Participants' education level, diabetes-related knowledge and English speaking were positively associated with NFP use. At the higher percentiles of diet quality score, NFP use was significantly associated with higher diet quality. Similarly, NFP users were more likely to consume a 'healthy' dietary pattern (P=0·003) and less likely to consume a 'fried snack' pattern (P=0·048) compared with NFP non-users. CONCLUSIONS: The association between reported NFP use and diet quality was positive and significantly stronger among participants who reported consuming a healthier diet. While NFP use was associated with a healthier dietary pattern, not using NFP was associated with a less-healthy, fried snack pattern. Longitudinal studies are needed to understand whether improving NFP use could be an effective intervention to improve diet quality among Latinos with type 2 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: The study aims were to (i) identify determinants of Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) use and (ii) describe the association between NFP use and dietary intake among Latinos with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Baseline cross-sectional data from a clinical trial were used to assess the association between NFP use and dietary intake. Diet was measured using two methods: (i) a diet quality score (the Healthy Eating Index-2010) derived from a single 24 h recall and (ii) dietary pattern (exploratory factor analyses) from an FFQ. Multivariable logistic and non-parametric quantile regressions were conducted, as appropriate. Settings Hartford County, Connecticut, USA. SUBJECTS: Latino adults (n 203), ≥21 years of age, with diagnosed type 2 diabetes, glycosylated Hb≥7 %, and without medical conditions limiting physical activity. RESULTS:Participants' education level, diabetes-related knowledge and English speaking were positively associated with NFP use. At the higher percentiles of diet quality score, NFP use was significantly associated with higher diet quality. Similarly, NFP users were more likely to consume a 'healthy' dietary pattern (P=0·003) and less likely to consume a 'fried snack' pattern (P=0·048) compared with NFP non-users. CONCLUSIONS: The association between reported NFP use and diet quality was positive and significantly stronger among participants who reported consuming a healthier diet. While NFP use was associated with a healthier dietary pattern, not using NFP was associated with a less-healthy, fried snack pattern. Longitudinal studies are needed to understand whether improving NFP use could be an effective intervention to improve diet quality among Latinos with type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Nichola J Davis; Clyde B Schechter; Felix Ortega; Rosa Rosen; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Elizabeth A Walker Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sarah Timmermans; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Marijana Vujkovic; Rachel Bakker; Hanneke den Breeijen; Hein Raat; Henk Russcher; Jan Lindemans; Albert Hofman; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Eric A P Steegers Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-05-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Mienah Z Sharif; Shemra Rizzo; Michael L Prelip; Deborah C Glik; Thomas R Belin; Brent A Langellier; Alice A Kuo; Jeremiah R Garza; Alexander N Ortega Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Grace Kollannoor-Samuel; Fatma M Shebl; Sofia Segura-Pérez; Jyoti Chhabra; Sonia Vega-López; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Indah S Widyahening; Yolanda van der Graaf; Pradana Soewondo; Paul Glasziou; Geert J M G van der Heijden Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 2.497