Literature DB >> 20655176

In vitro evaluation of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.

P D Ribeiro-Junior1, O Magro-Filho, K A Shastri, M B Papageorge.   

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the influence of the type of miniplate and the number of screws installed in the proximal and distal segments on the stability and resistance of Champy's osteosynthesis in mandibular angle fractures. Sixty polyurethane hemimandibles with bone-like consistency were randomly assigned to four groups (n=15) and sectioned in the mandibular angle region to simulate fracture. The bone segments were fixed by different osteosynthesis methods using 2.0 mm miniplates and 2.0 mm × 6 mm monocortical screws. In groups 1 and 2, two conventional (G1) or locking (G2) screws were installed in each bone segment using a conventional (G1) or a locking (G2) straight miniplate; in groups 3 and 4, three conventional (G3) or locking (G4) screws were installed in the proximal segment and four conventional (G3) or locking (G4) screws were installed in the distal segment using a conventional (G3) or a locking (G4) seven-hole straight miniplate. The hemimandibles were loaded in compressive strength until a 4mm displacement occurred between the segments, vertically or horizontally. Locking plate/screw systems provided significantly greater resistance to displacement than conventional ones (p<.01). Locking miniplates offered more resistance than conventional miniplates. Long locking miniplates provided greater stability than short ones.
Copyright © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20655176     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of in vitro resistance of different 2.0-mm titanium plates on the mandibular angle sectioning.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Kenichi Yamaji; Patrício José de Oliveira Neto; Michel de Campos Ribeiro; Lucas Cavalieri Pereira; Márcio de Morais; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-03

2.  Comparison of a 2.0-mm locking system with conventional 2.0- and 2.4-mm systems in the treatment of mandibular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rubens Camino Junior; Rogério Bonfante Moraes; Constantin Landes; João Gualberto C Luz
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 3.  Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: in vitro biomechanical assessments and computer-based studies.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-10-14

4.  Photoelastic analysis of conventional and locking system for treatment of mandibular angle fractures with a single plate.

Authors:  Danilo-Louzada de Oliveira; Victor-Eduardo de Souza-Batista; Letícia Holobenko; Joel-Ferreira Santiago-Junior; Eduardo-Piza Pellizzer; Paulo-Domingos Ribeiro-Junior
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-04-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.