Literature DB >> 25015878

Evaluation of in vitro resistance of different 2.0-mm titanium plates on the mandibular angle sectioning.

Marco Aurélio Kenichi Yamaji, Patrício José de Oliveira Neto, Michel de Campos Ribeiro, Lucas Cavalieri Pereira, Márcio de Morais, Cássio Edvard Sverzut, Alexandre Elias Trivellato.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare, by mechanical in vitro testing, a regular 5-hole plate and a long 4-hole plate with a regular 4-hole plate, applied to stabilize a simulated mandibular angle fracture. STUDY
DESIGN: The plates from the 2.0-mm titanium-based system were adapted and stabilized passively in the same site in both groups using four screws, 6 mm long. During the resistance-to-load test, the force was applied perpendicular to the occlusal plane at three different points: first molar at the plated side, first molar at the contralateral side, and between the central incisors.
RESULTS: The regular 5-hole plates and longer 4-hole plates were superior to the regular 4-hole plates. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found between the regular 5-hole plates and long 4-hole plate.
CONCLUSIONS: The length and shape of plates did not interfere with the effectiveness to stabilize the fragments.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare, by mechanical in vitro testing, a regular 5-hole plate and a long 4-hole plate with a regular 4-hole plate, applied to stabilize a simulated mandibular angle fracture.Study design The plates from the 2.0-mm titanium-based system were adapted and stabilized passively in the same site in both groups using four screws, 6 mm long. During the resistance-to-load test, the force was applied perpendicular to the occlusal plane at three different points: first molar at the plated side, first molar at the contralateral side, and between the central incisors.
RESULTS: The regular 5-hole plates and longer 4-hole plates were superior to the regular 4-hole plates. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found between the regular 5-hole plates and long 4-hole plate.Conclusions The length and shape of plates did not interfere with the effectiveness to stabilize the fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25015878     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-014-0456-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  31 in total

1.  Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy.

Authors:  K L Gerlach; A Schwarz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: an experimental study.

Authors:  Alparslan Esen; Doğan Dolanmaz; Hakan Hıfzı Tüz
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Biomechanical validation of the solitary lag screw technique for reducing mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  V Shetty; A Caputo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Biomechanical analysis of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Julie Kimsal; Bret Baack; Lionel Candelaria; Tariq Khraishi; Scott Lovald
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Comparison of miniplate versus lag-screw osteosynthesis for fractures of the mandibular angle.

Authors:  Heidrun Schaaf; Steffen Kaubruegge; Philipp Streckbein; Jan-Falco Wilbrand; Heiko Kerkmann; Hans-Peter Howaldt
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-07-02

6.  One- or two-plate fixation of mandibular angle fractures?

Authors:  H P Schierle; R Schmelzeisen; B Rahn; C Pytlik
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle.

Authors:  E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Relative displacement resistance of standard and low-profile bone plates in experimental mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  M Nissenbaum; M Lownie; P Cleaton-Jones
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-04

9.  Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using a single bioresorbable miniplate.

Authors:  Mohammad Bayat; Ata Garajei; Kasra Ghorbani; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Monocortical miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  F E Levy; R W Smith; R M Odland; L J Marentette
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Photoelastic analysis of conventional and locking system for treatment of mandibular angle fractures with a single plate.

Authors:  Danilo-Louzada de Oliveira; Victor-Eduardo de Souza-Batista; Letícia Holobenko; Joel-Ferreira Santiago-Junior; Eduardo-Piza Pellizzer; Paulo-Domingos Ribeiro-Junior
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-04-01

2.  A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Feng Liu; Ying-Ying Fan; Xian-Feng Jiang; Dale A Baur
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.819

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.