Literature DB >> 23064805

Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: in vitro biomechanical assessments and computer-based studies.

Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the literature regarding the evolution of current thoughts on fixation of mandibular angle fractures (MAFs), based on in vitro biomechanical assessments and computer-based studies.
METHODS: An electronic search in PubMed was undertaken in August 2012. The titles and abstracts from these results were read to identify studies within the selection criteria. Eligibility criteria included studies from the last 30 years (from 1983 onwards).
RESULTS: The search strategy initially identified 767 studies. Thirty-one studies were identified without repetition within the selection criteria. Two articles showing significance in the development of treatment techniques was included. Additional hand searching yielded five additional papers. Thus, a total of 38 studies were included.
CONCLUSIONS: The osteosynthesis positions as well as the plating technique play important roles in the stability of MAF repair. The only in vitro study evaluating the use of wire osteosynthesis concluded that wires placed through the lower border approach would provide greater stability than those at the upper border. Many studies indicate that the use of two miniplates avoids (or decreases) lateral displacement of the lower mandibular border and opening of the inferior fracture gap. Some studies even suggest that the use of two miniplates may be considered a more "rigid" fixation technique for MAFs than the use of a reconstruction plate. When using two miniplates, the biplanar plate orientation provides greater biomechanical stability than the monoplanar one. However, despite its greater biomechanical stability, the two-miniplate technique has some disadvantages that should also be taken into account. Studies with biodegradable plates suggest the use of at least two plates for each MAF. There are few studies with compression plates, and they have not yet reached a consensus. The solitary lag screw proved to withstand the functional loading of the mandible; however, only few biomechanical assessments were performed. In vitro studies have shown good biomechanical stability with the use of 3-D grid plates. The use of malleable miniplates alone is not sufficient to withstand the early postoperative bite force. Some studies suggest that the segment of the tension band miniplate located at the distal fragment of the MAF should be fixed with three screws. The studies also showed some limitations. None considered the stabilization of the fracture site afforded by the masseter-pterygoid muscle pouch. Most of the studies did not evaluate plating system strength in the long term and therefore did not observe the effect of resorption on the strength of the different biodegradable plating systems. Another limitation of many studies is the absence of a control group. A confounding factor that could not be tested in in vitro investigations is the additional resistance to displacement of jagged fracture margins present in the human fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23064805     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-012-0367-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  57 in total

1.  Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy.

Authors:  K L Gerlach; A Schwarz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Comparison of tensile strength of resorbable plating systems used in monocortical mandible angle osteotomy repair.

Authors:  Sonu Abhishek Jain; Oliver Pope Simmons; Michael Stephen Hanemann; Richard V Baratta; Aldo Benjamin Guerra; Stephen Eric Metzinger
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

3.  Comparison of stability of titanium and absorbable plate and screw fixation for mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Alparslan Esen; Hanife Ataoğlu; Lokman Gemi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-08-20

4.  Biomechanical analysis of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Julie Kimsal; Bret Baack; Lionel Candelaria; Tariq Khraishi; Scott Lovald
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Comparison of strains produced by titanium and poly D, L-lactide Acid plating systems to in vitro forces.

Authors:  Guillermo E Chacon; Frederick Matt Dillard; Nancy Clelland; Robert Rashid
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Relative displacement resistance of standard and low-profile bone plates in experimental mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  M Nissenbaum; M Lownie; P Cleaton-Jones
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-04

Review 7.  Open versus closed reduction: comminuted mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07-29

Review 8.  Considerations of mandibular angle fractures during and after surgery for removal of third molars: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Antônio Luís Neto Custódio
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-06

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques for fixing mandibular angle fractures: the introduction of a new 3D plate approach.

Authors:  Evagelos F Kalfarentzos; Despoina Deligianni; Georgios Mitros; Minos Tyllianakis
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-09

10.  Computer-aided optimization of choice and positioning of bone plates and screws used for internal fixation of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  F R Rozema; E Otten; R R Bos; G Boering; J D van Willigen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.789

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ti-15Mo Alloy Decreases the Stress Concentration in Mandibular Angle Fracture Internal Fixation Hardware.

Authors:  F P S Guastaldi; A P Martini; E P Rocha; E Hochuli-Vieira; A C Guastaldi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-06-03

2.  Computed tomography data collection of the complete human mandible and valid clinical ground truth models.

Authors:  Jürgen Wallner; Irene Mischak
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 6.444

3.  Fracture Fixation Technique and Chewing Side Impact Jaw Mechanics in Mandible Fracture Repair.

Authors:  Hyab Mehari Abraha; José Iriarte-Diaz; Russell R Reid; Callum F Ross; Olga Panagiotopoulou
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-10-13

Review 4.  Photoelasticity for Stress Concentration Analysis in Dentistry and Medicine.

Authors:  Miriam Marín-Miranda; Ana María Wintergerst; Yoshamin Abnoba Moreno-Vargas; María Lilia Adriana Juárez-López; Cesar Tavera-Ruiz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Clinical evaluation of semi-automatic open-source algorithmic software segmentation of the mandibular bone: Practical feasibility and assessment of a new course of action.

Authors:  Jürgen Wallner; Kerstin Hochegger; Xiaojun Chen; Irene Mischak; Knut Reinbacher; Mauro Pau; Tomislav Zrnc; Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer; Wolfgang Zemann; Dieter Schmalstieg; Jan Egger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Treatment of Mandible Fractures Using a Miniplate System: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren Bohner; Fabian Beiglboeck; Stephanie Schwipper; Rômulo Maciel Lustosa; Carla Pieirna Marino Segura; Johannes Kleinheinz; Susanne Jung
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.