Literature DB >> 20653422

Diminished suture strength after robotic needle driver manipulation.

Daniel Ricchiuti1, Jeffrey Cerone, Scott Shie, Ajay Jetley, Donald Noe, Mark Kovacik.   

Abstract

Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery has become a routine surgical option for the treatment of prostate cancer. Despite its technical advancements, the da Vinci(®) Surgical System still lacks haptic feedback to the surgeon, resulting in a maximally applied compressive force by the robotic needle driver during every grasping maneuver. Without this perceptional sense of touch and grip control, repetitive robotic needle driver manipulation may unknowingly lead to irreparable damage to fine sutures used during delicate anastomotic repairs. For robotic prostatectomy, any such loss of integrity can potentially lead to premature breakdown of the urethrovesical anastomosis and urine extravasation, especially important for a less-than-perfectly fashioned anastomotic repair. Although it has already been established that overhandling of sutures using handheld laparoscopic instruments can lead to reduced suture strength, it has not been established to what extent this may occur after robotic surgical procedures. We present analytical data and analyses concerning the failure strength of fine sutures commonly used for urethrovesical anastomotic repair during robotic prostatectomy, after repetitive robotic needle driver manipulation. When compared with noncompromised monofilament suture controls, the average maximal failure force after repetitive robotic manipulation was significantly reduced by 35% (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the average maximal failure force of braided sutures was significantly reduced after repetitive robotic manipulation by 3% (p = 0.009). This work demonstrates that significant reductions in monofilament and braided suture strength integrity can occur after customary repetitive manipulation by robotic needle drivers in an ex vivo model, with further research warranted in the in vivo setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20653422     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Simona Palladino; Gabriele Massimetti; Fabio Vistoli; Fabio Caniglia; Nelide De Lio; Vittorio Perrone; Linda Barbarello; Mario Belluomini; Stefano Signori; Gabriella Amorese; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection.

Authors:  Emanuele F Kauffmann; Niccolò Napoli; Francesca Menonna; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese; Daniela Campani; Luca Emanuele Pollina; Niccola Funel; Carla Cappelli; Davide Caramella; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between running versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Ju Hyun Lim; Chang Myon Park; Han Kwon Kim; Jong Yeon Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.