OBJECTIVE: Population studies have shown that age at menopause (AAM) predicts coronary heart disease. It is unknown, however, whether early menopause predicts post-myocardial infarction (MI) angina. We examined whether younger AAM increases risk of post-MI angina. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter MI registry, 493 postmenopausal women were enrolled (mean +/- SD age, 65.4 +/- 11.3 y, and mean +/- SD AAM, 45.2 ± 7.8 y). We categorized AAM into 40 years or younger, 41 to 49 years, and 50 years or older. In the multivariable analysis, we examined whether AAM predicted 1-year post-MI angina and severity of angina after adjusting for angina before MI, demographics, comorbidities, MI severity, and quality of care (QOC). RESULTS: Women with early AAM (> or =40 y; n = 132, 26.8%) were younger and more often smokers but were as likely to have comorbidities as were women with an AAM of 50 years or older. Although there were no differences in pre-MI angina, MI severity, obstructive coronary disease, and QOC based on AAM, the rate of 1-year angina was higher in women with an AAM of 40 years or younger (32.4%) than in women with an AAM of 50 years or older (12.2%). In the multivariable analysis, women with an AAM of 40 years or younger had more than twice the risk of angina (relative risk, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.38-3.17) and a higher severity of angina (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.34-5.22 for a higher severity level) compared with women with an AAM of 50 years or older. CONCLUSIONS: Women with early menopause are at higher risk of angina after MI, independent of comorbidities, severity of MI, and QOC. The use of a simple question regarding AAM may help in the identification of women who need closer follow-up, careful evaluation, and intervention to improve their symptoms and quality of life after MI.
OBJECTIVE: Population studies have shown that age at menopause (AAM) predicts coronary heart disease. It is unknown, however, whether early menopause predicts post-myocardial infarction (MI) angina. We examined whether younger AAM increases risk of post-MI angina. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter MI registry, 493 postmenopausal women were enrolled (mean +/- SD age, 65.4 +/- 11.3 y, and mean +/- SD AAM, 45.2 ± 7.8 y). We categorized AAM into 40 years or younger, 41 to 49 years, and 50 years or older. In the multivariable analysis, we examined whether AAM predicted 1-year post-MI angina and severity of angina after adjusting for angina before MI, demographics, comorbidities, MI severity, and quality of care (QOC). RESULTS:Women with early AAM (> or =40 y; n = 132, 26.8%) were younger and more often smokers but were as likely to have comorbidities as were women with an AAM of 50 years or older. Although there were no differences in pre-MI angina, MI severity, obstructive coronary disease, and QOC based on AAM, the rate of 1-year angina was higher in women with an AAM of 40 years or younger (32.4%) than in women with an AAM of 50 years or older (12.2%). In the multivariable analysis, women with an AAM of 40 years or younger had more than twice the risk of angina (relative risk, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.38-3.17) and a higher severity of angina (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.34-5.22 for a higher severity level) compared with women with an AAM of 50 years or older. CONCLUSIONS:Women with early menopause are at higher risk of angina after MI, independent of comorbidities, severity of MI, and QOC. The use of a simple question regarding AAM may help in the identification of women who need closer follow-up, careful evaluation, and intervention to improve their symptoms and quality of life after MI.
Authors: D S Sheps; P G Kaufmann; D Sheffield; K C Light; R P McMahon; R Bonsall; W Maixner; R M Carney; K E Freedland; J D Cohen; A D Goldberg; M W Ketterer; J M Raczynski; C J Pepine Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Deborah Grady; David Herrington; Vera Bittner; Roger Blumenthal; Michael Davidson; Mark Hlatky; Judith Hsia; Stephen Hulley; Alan Herd; Steven Khan; L Kristin Newby; David Waters; Eric Vittinghoff; Nanette Wenger Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan Abrams; Kanu Chatterjee; Jennifer Daley; Prakash C Deedwania; John S Douglas; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephan D Fihn; Theodore D Fraker; Julius M Gardin; Robert A O'Rourke; Richard C Pasternak; Sankey V Williams; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; Elliott M Antman; Loren F Hiratzka; Valentin Fuster; David P Faxon; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J A Spertus; J A Winder; T A Dewhurst; R A Deyo; J Prodzinski; M McDonell; S D Fihn Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Colleen M Norris; William A Ghali; P Diane Galbraith; Michelle M Graham; Louise A Jensen; Merril L Knudtson Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2004-05-05 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Joyce T Bromberger; Melissa D Latham; Nancy E Adler; Lauri A Pasch; Steven E Gregorich; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Steven E Gregorich; Daniel McConnell; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Steven E Gregorich; Nancy E Adler; Barbara Sternfeld; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Ellen B Gold; Sybil L Crawford; Nancy E Avis; Carolyn J Crandall; Karen A Matthews; L Elaine Waetjen; Jennifer S Lee; Rebecca Thurston; Marike Vuga; Siobán D Harlow Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 4.897