OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this article are to review the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline, version 1.1, highlighting the major changes in the new version compared with the original RECIST guideline (version 1.0), and to present case examples with representative imaging. CONCLUSION: Familiarity with the revised RECIST is essential in day-to-day oncologic imaging practice to provide up-to-date service to oncologists and their patients. Some of the changes in the revised RECIST affect how radiologists select, measure, and report target lesions.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this article are to review the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline, version 1.1, highlighting the major changes in the new version compared with the original RECIST guideline (version 1.0), and to present case examples with representative imaging. CONCLUSION: Familiarity with the revised RECIST is essential in day-to-day oncologic imaging practice to provide up-to-date service to oncologists and their patients. Some of the changes in the revised RECIST affect how radiologists select, measure, and report target lesions.
Authors: Mizuki Nishino; Lynette M Sholl; Mark M Awad; Hiroto Hatabu; Philippe Armand; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Katherine M Krajewski; Yoko Franchetti; Mizuki Nishino; André P Fay; Nikhil Ramaiya; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-04-22
Authors: Kathleen Ruchalski; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Michael Douek; Victor Sai; Antonio Gutierrez; Rohit Dewan; Jonathan Goldin Journal: Radiol Imaging Cancer Date: 2021-05
Authors: Mizuki Nishino; Stephanie Cardarella; Suzanne E Dahlberg; David M Jackman; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Hiroto Hatabu; Michael S Rabin; Pasi A Jänne; Bruce E Johnson Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 5.705