Literature DB >> 24755461

10% Tumor diameter shrinkage on the first follow-up computed tomography predicts clinical outcome in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with angiogenesis inhibitors: a follow-up validation study.

Katherine M Krajewski1, Yoko Franchetti, Mizuki Nishino, André P Fay, Nikhil Ramaiya, Annick D Van den Abbeele, Toni K Choueiri.   

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agents are standard therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), associated with variable tumor shrinkage. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is of limited utility in this setting, and other imaging changes are sought to reliably predict outcome early. We aim to validate 10% tumor shrinkage as the best early indicator of outcome. Methods. In this institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, 66 mRCC patients with 165 lesions on clinical trials of VEGF-targeted agents underwent thoracic and abdominal computed tomography at baseline and at first follow-up after therapy. Measurements were performed according to RECIST and tumor shrinkage of ≥10% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (-10%SLD). Correlation with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were compared and stratified by response to the radiologic criteria. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis yielded the optimal threshold change in SLD, defining patients with prolonged survival. Results. More than -10%SLD significantly differentiated responders from nonresponders (median TTF 8.4 vs. 4.1 months, p = .001), whereas partial response by RECIST did not (median TTF 6.9 vs. 5.5 months in responders vs. nonresponders, p = .34). -10%SLD was also significantly predictive of OS (median OS 35.1 vs. 15.0 months in responders vs. nonresponders, p = .003). ROC curve analysis yielded -9.3% in SLD as the optimal threshold for response/no response. Conclusion. Ten percent tumor shrinkage is validated as a reliable early predictor of outcome in mRCC patients receiving VEGF-targeted therapies and may provide a practical measure to guide therapeutic decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choi; RECIST 1.0; Renal cell carcinoma; Tumor shrinkage; VEGF-targeted therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24755461      PMCID: PMC4012965          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  23 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Activity of SU11248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; M Dror Michaelson; Bruce G Redman; Gary R Hudes; George Wilding; Robert A Figlin; Michelle S Ginsberg; Sindy T Kim; Charles M Baum; Samuel E DePrimo; Jim Z Li; Carlo L Bello; Charles P Theuer; Daniel J George; Brian I Rini
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Assessing tumor response and detecting recurrence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on targeted therapy: importance of size and attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Andrew Dennis Smith; Michael L Lieber; Shetal N Shah
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria.

Authors:  Haesun Choi; Chuslip Charnsangavej; Silvana C Faria; Homer A Macapinlac; Michael A Burgess; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Lei L Chen; Donald A Podoloff; Robert S Benjamin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, for metastatic renal cancer.

Authors:  James C Yang; Leah Haworth; Richard M Sherry; Patrick Hwu; Douglas J Schwartzentruber; Suzanne L Topalian; Seth M Steinberg; Helen X Chen; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability in computed tomography size and attenuation measurements in patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving antiangiogenic therapy: implications for alternative response criteria.

Authors:  Katherine M Krajewski; Mizuki Nishino; Yoko Franchetti; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Sunitinib efficacy against advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; M Dror Michaelson; Jonathan Rosenberg; Ronald M Bukowski; Brendan D Curti; Daniel J George; Gary R Hudes; Bruce G Redman; Kim A Margolin; George Wilding
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  26 in total

1.  mTOR-inhibitor treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: contribution of Choi and modified Choi criteria assessed in 2D or 3D to evaluate tumor response.

Authors:  M Lamuraglia; S Raslan; R Elaidi; S Oudard; B Escudier; K Slimane; R Renard Penna; M Wagner; O Lucidarme
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Long-Term Response to Sunitinib Treatment in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Nizar M Tannir; Robert A Figlin; Martin E Gore; M Dror Michaelson; Robert J Motzer; Camillo Porta; Brian I Rini; Caroline Hoang; Xun Lin; Bernard Escudier
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  CT evaluation of response in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with long-acting-repeatable octreotide: what is the optimal size variation threshold?

Authors:  Yanji Luo; Jie Chen; Bingqi Shen; Meng Wang; Huasong Cai; Ling Xu; Luohai Chen; Minhu Chen; Zi-Ping Li; Shi-Ting Feng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Are we ready for the 10% solution?

Authors:  Helen X Chen; Larry V Rubinstein; Lalitha K Shankar; Jeffrey S Abrams
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-04-22

5.  Systemic treatment of the metastatic renal cell carcinoma: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion-weighted MRI in prediction of early therapeutic response.

Authors:  Yulian Mytsyk; Serhiy Pasichnyk; Ihor Dutka; Ihor Dats; Dmytro Vorobets; Michał Skrzypczyk; Yerzhan Uteuliyev; Andrea Botikova; Katarina Gazdikova; Peter Kubatka; Peter Urdzik; Peter Kruzliak
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Analysis of response-related endpoints in trials of first-line medical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe A Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Domenico Guarneri
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Prognostic Significance of Early Tumor Shrinkage Under Second-Line Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Study in Japan.

Authors:  Hideaki Miyake; Ken-Ichi Harada; Seiichiro Ozono; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Early primary renal tumor response predicts clinical outcome in patients with primary unresectable renal cell carcinoma with synchronous distant metastasis receiving molecularly targeted therapies.

Authors:  Kosuke Ueda; Shigetaka Suekane; Kiyoaki Nishihara; Hiroki Suekane; Naoyuki Ogasawara; Hirofumi Kurose; Katsuaki Chikui; Kazuhisa Ejima; Shunsuke Suyama; Makoto Nakiri; Mitsunori Matsuo; Tsukasa Igawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-15

Review 9.  Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Cristina Suárez; Marc Campayo; Romà Bastús; Sergi Castillo; Olatz Etxanitz; Marta Guix; Núria Sala; Enrique Gallardo
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.493

10.  Algorithms in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma--Analysis Using Diagnostic Nodes.

Authors:  Christian Rothermundt; Alexandra Bailey; Linda Cerbone; Tim Eisen; Bernard Escudier; Silke Gillessen; Viktor Grünwald; James Larkin; David McDermott; Jan Oldenburg; Camillo Porta; Brian Rini; Manuela Schmidinger; Cora Sternberg; Paul M Putora
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.