Literature DB >> 20651016

Percutaneous vertebroplasty is not a risk factor for new osteoporotic compression fractures: results from VERTOS II.

C A H Klazen1, A Venmans, J de Vries, W J van Rooij, F H Jansen, M C Blonk, P N M Lohle, J R Juttmann, E Buskens, K J van Everdingen, A Muller, H Fransen, O E Elgersma, W P Th M Mali, H J J Verhaar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: PV is increasingly used as treatment for osteoporotic VCFs. However, controversy exists as to whether PV increases the risk for new VCFs during follow-up. The purpose of our research was to assess the incidence of new VCFs in patients with acute VCFs randomized to PV and conservative therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: VERTOS II is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing PV with conservative therapy in 202 patients. Incidence, distribution, and timing of new VCFs during follow-up were assessed from spine radiographs. In addition, further height loss during follow-up of treated VCFs was measured.
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 11.4 months (median, 12.0; range, 1-24 months), 18 new VCFs occurred in 15 of 91 patients after PV and 30 new VCFs in 21 of 85 patients after conservative therapy. This difference was not significant (P = .44). There was no higher fracture risk for adjacent-versus-distant vertebrae. Mean time to new VCF was 16.2 months after PV and 17.8 months after conservative treatment (logrank, P = .45). The baseline number of VCFs was the only risk factor for occurrence (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.05-1.95) and number (P = .01) of new VCFs. After conservative therapy, further height loss of treated vertebrae occurred more frequently (35 of 85 versus 11 of 91 patients, P < .001) and was more severe (P < .001) than after PV.
CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of new VCFs was not different after PV compared with conservative therapy after a mean of 11.4 months' follow-up. The only risk factor for new VCFs was the number of VCFs at baseline. PV contributed to preservation of stature by decreasing both the incidence and severity of further height loss in treated vertebrae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20651016      PMCID: PMC7966121          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  24 in total

1.  New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner.

Authors:  A T Trout; D F Kallmes; T J Kaufmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  New symptomatic vertebral compression fractures within a year following vertebroplasty in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  Mubin I Syed; Neel A Patel; Solomon Jan; Michael S Harron; Kamal Morar; Azim Shaikh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fracture: multivariate study of predictors of new vertebral body fracture.

Authors:  Atsushi Komemushi; Noboru Tanigawa; Shuji Kariya; Hiroyuki Kojima; Yuzo Shomura; Sadao Komemushi; Satoshi Sawada
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Does vertebroplasty cause incident vertebral fractures? A review of available data.

Authors:  A T Trout; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Vertebroplasty: cement leakage into the disc increases the risk of new fracture of adjacent vertebral body.

Authors:  Edward P Lin; Sven Ekholm; Akio Hiwatashi; Per-Lennart Westesson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Incidence of symptomatic vertebral fractures in patients after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes Hierholzer; Heiko Fuchs; Kerstin Westphalen; Clemens Baumann; Christine Slotosch; Rudolf Schulz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  CT-guided vertebroplasty in osteoprotic vertebral fractures: incidence of secondary fractures and impact of intradiscal cement leakages during follow-up.

Authors:  M B Pitton; S Herber; C Bletz; P Drees; N Morgen; U Koch; B Böhm; A Eckardt; C Düber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Vertebroplasty, first 1000 levels of a single center: evaluation of the outcomes and complications.

Authors:  K F Layton; K R Thielen; C A Koch; P H Luetmer; J I Lane; J T Wald; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  38 in total

1.  The effect of standard and low-modulus cement augmentation on the stiffness, strength, and endplate pressure distribution in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Kinzl; Lorin M Benneker; Andreas Boger; Philippe K Zysset; Dieter H Pahr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  New vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty: 2-year results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M P Staples; B M Howe; M D Ringler; P Mitchell; C H R Wriedt; J D Wark; P R Ebeling; R H Osborne; D F Kallmes; R Buchbinder
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  [Current status of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in Germany: an analysis of surgical disciplines].

Authors:  A Krüger; J Hierholzer; M Bergmann; L Oberkircher; S Ruchholtz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Risk factors of new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures in osteoporotic patients undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Hai-long Ren; Jian-ming Jiang; Jian-ting Chen; Ji-xing Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Health economic aspects of vertebral augmentation procedures.

Authors:  F Borgström; D P Beall; S Berven; S Boonen; S Christie; D F Kallmes; J A Kanis; G Olafsson; A J Singer; K Åkesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  What's new in vertebral cementoplasty?

Authors:  Mario Muto; Gianluigi Guarnieri; Francesco Giurazza; Luigi Manfrè
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Risk factor analysis for re-collapse of cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).

Authors:  Yong-Xian Li; Dan-Qing Guo; Shun-Cong Zhang; Kai Yuan; Guo-Ye Mo; Da-Xing Li; Hui-Zhi Guo; Yongchao Tang; Pei-Jie Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation with silicone and PMMA cement and two filling grades.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Alexander Keiler; Felix Riechelmann; Tobias Lange; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Effect of zoledronic acid on lumbar spinal fusion in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  Qirui Ding; Jian Chen; Jin Fan; Qingqing Li; Guoyong Yin; Lipeng Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?

Authors:  Jan Philipp Kolb; Rebecca A Kueny; Klaus Püschel; Andreas Boger; Johannes M Rueger; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.