BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent research has suggested the importance of plaque composition to identify patients at risk for stroke. This study aims to identify specific plaque features on 3T carotid MR imaging and CE-MRA associated with recent carotid thromboembolic symptoms in patients with mild/moderate versus severe stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients (symptomatic, 13; asymptomatic, 84) with 50%-99% stenosis by sonography or CT angiography underwent carotid plaque imaging combined with MRA at 3T. The symptomatic carotid artery or the most stenotic asymptomatic carotid artery was chosen as the index vessel to be analyzed. Plaque features were compared by symptomatic status in patients with mild/moderate (30%-70%) versus severe (70%-99%) stenosis on MRA. RESULTS: Ninety (92.8%) patients had sufficient image quality for interpretation. In 50 patients with mild/moderate stenosis, there were significant associations between the presence of the following plaque characteristics and symptoms: thin/ruptured fibrous cap (100% versus 36%, P = .006) and lipid-rich necrotic core (100% versus 39%, P = .022), with marginal association with hemorrhage (86% versus 33%, P = .055). In 40 patients with severe stenosis, only the angiographic presence of ulceration (86% versus 36%, P = .039) was associated with symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Several plaque components identified on 3T MR imaging are correlated with recent ipsilateral carotid thromboembolic symptoms. These preliminary results also suggest that associations between plaque characteristics and symptom history may vary by degree of stenosis. If confirmed in larger studies, carotid MR imaging may distinguish stable from unstable lesions, particularly in individuals with mild/moderate stenosis in whom the role of surgical intervention is currently unclear.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent research has suggested the importance of plaque composition to identify patients at risk for stroke. This study aims to identify specific plaque features on 3T carotid MR imaging and CE-MRA associated with recent carotid thromboembolic symptoms in patients with mild/moderate versus severe stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients (symptomatic, 13; asymptomatic, 84) with 50%-99% stenosis by sonography or CT angiography underwent carotid plaque imaging combined with MRA at 3T. The symptomatic carotid artery or the most stenotic asymptomatic carotid artery was chosen as the index vessel to be analyzed. Plaque features were compared by symptomatic status in patients with mild/moderate (30%-70%) versus severe (70%-99%) stenosis on MRA. RESULTS: Ninety (92.8%) patients had sufficient image quality for interpretation. In 50 patients with mild/moderate stenosis, there were significant associations between the presence of the following plaque characteristics and symptoms: thin/ruptured fibrous cap (100% versus 36%, P = .006) and lipid-rich necrotic core (100% versus 39%, P = .022), with marginal association with hemorrhage (86% versus 33%, P = .055). In 40 patients with severe stenosis, only the angiographic presence of ulceration (86% versus 36%, P = .039) was associated with symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Several plaque components identified on 3T MR imaging are correlated with recent ipsilateral carotid thromboembolic symptoms. These preliminary results also suggest that associations between plaque characteristics and symptom history may vary by degree of stenosis. If confirmed in larger studies, carotid MR imaging may distinguish stable from unstable lesions, particularly in individuals with mild/moderate stenosis in whom the role of surgical intervention is currently unclear.
Authors: J M U-King-Im; T Y Tang; A Patterson; M J Graves; S Howarth; Z-Y Li; R Trivedi; D Bowden; P J Kirkpatrick; M E Gaunt; E A Warburton; N M Antoun; J H Gillard Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: N Yamada; M Higashi; R Otsubo; T Sakuma; N Oyama; R Tanaka; K Iihara; H Naritomi; K Minematsu; H Naito Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Tobias Saam; Jianming Cai; Lin Ma; You-Quan Cai; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak L Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Baocheng Chu; Annette Kampschulte; Marina S Ferguson; William S Kerwin; Vasily L Yarnykh; Kevin D O'Brien; Nayak L Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-04-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: L Saba; G Micheletti; W Brinjikji; P Garofalo; R Montisci; A Balestrieri; J S Suri; J K DeMarco; G Lanzino; R Sanfilippo Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lorenzo Mannelli; Lawrence MacDonald; Marcello Mancini; Marina Ferguson; William P Shuman; Monica Ragucci; Serena Monti; Dongxiang Xu; Chun Yuan; Lee M Mitsumori Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dongxiang Xu; Daniel S Hippe; Hunter R Underhill; Minako Oikawa-Wakayama; Li Dong; Kiyofumi Yamada; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-03-13
Authors: Laura A Fitzpatrick; Nadav Berkovitz; Marlise P Dos Santos; Nevin Majeed; Rafael Glikstein; Santanu Chakraborty; John P Veinot; Grant Stotts; Alain Berthiaume; Robert Chatelain Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2017-01-10
Authors: L Saba; G Lanzino; P Lucatelli; F Lavra; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; J S Suri; C Yuan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: John C Benson; Heidi Cheek; Marie C Aubry; Giuseppe Lanzino; John Huston Iii; Alejandro Rabinstein; Waleed Brinjikji Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 3.649