BACKGROUND: Few population-based data are available on the quality of outpatient care provided by resident physicians in the US. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of outpatient care delivered by resident and staff physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. We used chi-square tests to compare resident and staff physician performance on 19 quality indicators. Using multivariable logistic regression, we controlled for sex, age, race/ethnicity, insurance, and metropolitan status. PARTICIPANTS: 33,900 hospital-based outpatient visits from the 1997-2004 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). MEASUREMENTS: Resident and staff physician performance on 19 quality indicators. RESULTS: Resident physicians were more likely to care for younger, non-white, female, urban, and Medicaid-insured patients. In both adjusted and unadjusted analyses, residents outperformed staff on four of 19 measures including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use for congestive heart failure (57.0% vs. 27.6%; p=<0.001), diuretic use for hypertension (57.8% vs. 44.0%; p=<0.001), statin use for hyperlipidemia (56.3% vs. 40.4%; p=0.001), and routine blood pressure screening (85.3% vs. 79.6%; p=0.02). Residents and staff performed at similar levels for counseling (range 15.7 to 32.0%). Residents and staff performed similarly well on measures capturing inappropriate prescribing or overuse of diagnostic testing (range 48.6 to 100%). Residents and staff performed similarly on measures of appropriate prescribing (range from 30.9% to 69.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Primary care provided by resident physicians is of similar or higher quality than that provided by staff physicians. Significant opportunity remains to improve quality of outpatient care provided by all physicians. Residency training programs should devote attention to improving outpatient quality of care delivered by residents.
BACKGROUND: Few population-based data are available on the quality of outpatient care provided by resident physicians in the US. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of outpatient care delivered by resident and staff physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. We used chi-square tests to compare resident and staff physician performance on 19 quality indicators. Using multivariable logistic regression, we controlled for sex, age, race/ethnicity, insurance, and metropolitan status. PARTICIPANTS: 33,900 hospital-based outpatient visits from the 1997-2004 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). MEASUREMENTS: Resident and staff physician performance on 19 quality indicators. RESULTS: Resident physicians were more likely to care for younger, non-white, female, urban, and Medicaid-insured patients. In both adjusted and unadjusted analyses, residents outperformed staff on four of 19 measures including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use for congestive heart failure (57.0% vs. 27.6%; p=<0.001), diuretic use for hypertension (57.8% vs. 44.0%; p=<0.001), statin use for hyperlipidemia (56.3% vs. 40.4%; p=0.001), and routine blood pressure screening (85.3% vs. 79.6%; p=0.02). Residents and staff performed at similar levels for counseling (range 15.7 to 32.0%). Residents and staff performed similarly well on measures capturing inappropriate prescribing or overuse of diagnostic testing (range 48.6 to 100%). Residents and staff performed similarly on measures of appropriate prescribing (range from 30.9% to 69.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Primary care provided by resident physicians is of similar or higher quality than that provided by staff physicians. Significant opportunity remains to improve quality of outpatient care provided by all physicians. Residency training programs should devote attention to improving outpatient quality of care delivered by residents.
Authors: A M Zaslavsky; J N Hochheimer; E C Schneider; P D Cleary; J J Seidman; E A McGlynn; J W Thompson; C Sennett; A M Epstein Journal: Med Care Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christianne L Roumie; Natasha B Halasa; Kathryn M Edwards; Yuwei Zhu; Robert S Dittus; Marie R Griffin Journal: Am J Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Utibe R Essien; Wei He; Alaka Ray; Yuchiao Chang; Jonathan R Abraham; Daniel E Singer; Steven J Atlas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Daisy Fung; Inge Schabort; Catherine A MacLean; Farhan M Asrar; Ayesha Khory; Ben Vandermeer; G Michael Allan Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Maelys Amat; Rebecca Glassman; Nisha Basu; Jim Doolin; Lydia Flier; Mariana R Gonzalez; Jeanne Gosselin; Sarah Knapp; Phillip Yun; Kelly L Graham Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Louise M Henderson; Laura M Jones; Mary W Marsh; Alison T Brenner; Adam O Goldstein; Thad S Benefield; Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman; Paul L Molina; M Patricia Rivera; Daniel S Reuland Journal: Risk Manag Healthc Policy Date: 2018-01-22
Authors: Erin Yildirim Rieger; Josef N S Kushner; Veena Sriram; Abbie Klein; Lauren O Wiklund; David O Meltzer; Joyce W Tang Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 2.692