Literature DB >> 9879302

How good is the quality of health care in the United States?

M A Schuster1, E A McGlynn, R H Brook.   

Abstract

Studies over the past decade show that some people are receiving more care than they need, and some are receiving less. Simple averages from a number of studies indicate that 50 percent of people received recommended preventive care; 70 percent, recommended acute care; 30 percent, contraindicated acute care; 60 percent, recommended chronic care; and 20 percent, contraindicated chronic care. These studies strongly suggest that the care delivered in the United States often does not meet professional standards. Efforts to measure quality and report routinely on the results to the public at large would allow more definitive assessments of the status of the nation's health care and would enable us to single out the areas in need of improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9879302      PMCID: PMC2751100          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  130 in total

1.  For and against: Direct to consumer advertising is medicalising normal human experience: Against.

Authors:  Silvia N Bonaccorso; Jeffrey L Sturchio
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

2.  Public release of performance data and quality improvement: internal responses to external data by US health care providers.

Authors:  H T Davies
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

3.  Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems.

Authors:  S A Kirk; S M Campbell; S Kennell-Webb; D Reeves; M O Roland; M N Marshall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

Review 4.  Clinical decision support provided within physician order entry systems: a systematic review of features effective for changing clinician behavior.

Authors:  Kensaku Kawamoto; David F Lobach
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

5.  A communitywide intervention to improve outcomes and reduce disability among injured workers in Washington State.

Authors:  Thomas M Wickizer; Gary M Franklin; Robert D Mootz; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Roy Plaeger-Brockway; Diana Drylie; Judith A Turner; Terri Smith-Weller
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Do stakeholders in wound care prefer evidence-based wound care products? A survey in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anne M Eskes; Marja N Storm-Versloot; Hester Vermeulen; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  The contribution of systematic reviews to the practice of pediatric nephrology.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hodson; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Elena Parmelli; Gaby Doumit; Melina Gattellari; Mary Ann O'Brien; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-08-10

9.  Quality of US primary care delivered by resident and staff physicians.

Authors:  Leah Zallman; Jun Ma; Lan Xiao; Karen E Lasser
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Necessary but Not Sufficient… Comment on "Knowledge Mobilization in Healthcare Organizations: A View From the Resource-Based View of the Firm".

Authors:  Gill Harvey; Alison Kitson
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.