Literature DB >> 2064493

Aneroid sphygmomanometers. An assessment of accuracy at a university hospital and clinics.

R H Bailey1, V L Knaus, J H Bauer.   

Abstract

Defects of aneroid sphygmomanometers are a source of error in blood pressure measurement. We inspected 230 aneroid sphygmomanometers for physical defects and compared their accuracy against a standard mercury manometer at five different pressure points. An aneroid sphygmomanometer was defined as intolerant if it deviated from the mercury manometer by greater than +/- 3 mm Hg at two or more of the test points. The three most common physical defects were indicator needles not pointing to the "zero box," cracked face plates, and defective tubing. Eighty (34.8 of the 230 aneroid sphygmomanometers were determined to be intolerant with the greatest frequency of deviation seen at pressure levels of 150 mm Hg or greater. We recommend that aneroid manometers be inspected for physical defects and calibrated for accuracy against a standard mercury manometer at 6-month intervals to prevent inaccurate blood pressure measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2064493     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.151.7.1409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  9 in total

1.  The extent of inaccurate aneroid sphygmomanometers in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Dimitri A Cozanitis; Christopher J Jones
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring: a review of current applications.

Authors:  Elena Chung; Guo Chen; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Blood Pressure Assessment in Adults in Clinical Practice and Clinic-Based Research: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Paula T Einhorn; William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Natalie A Bello; Paul E Drawz; Beverly B Green; Daniel W Jones; Stephen P Juraschek; Karen L Margolis; Edgar R Miller; Ann Marie Navar; Yechiam Ostchega; Michael K Rakotz; Bernard Rosner; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo; George S Stergiou; Raymond R Townsend; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  [Evaluation of sphygmomanometers used by family physicians practicing outside the hospital environment in Bas-Saint-Laurent].

Authors:  A Vanasse; J Courteau
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Principles and techniques of blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe; Thomas Pickering
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.213

6.  Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.

Authors:  Yong Ma; Marinella Temprosa; Sarah Fowler; Ronald J Prineas; Maria G Montez; Janet Brown-Friday; Mary L Carrion-Petersen; Tracy Whittington
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 7.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Blood pressure measurements and hypertension in infants, children, and adolescents: from the postmercury to mobile devices.

Authors:  Seon Hee Lim; Seong Heon Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Pediatr       Date:  2021-09-15

9.  Impact of terminal digit preference by family physicians and sphygmomanometer calibration errors on blood pressure value: implication for hypertension screening.

Authors:  Theophile Niyonsenga; Alain Vanasse; Josiane Courteau; Lyne Cloutier
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.