Literature DB >> 20644498

Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men.

Shua J Chai1, Bulbulgul Aumakhan, Mathilda Barnes, Mary Jett-Goheen, Nicole Quinn, Patricia Agreda, Pamela Whittle, Terry Hogan, Wiley D Jenkins, Cornelis A Rietmeijer, Charlotte A Gaydos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been acceptable to women, and can reach high-risk populations. No prior published data describe internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in men. We studied whether internet-based screening was acceptable and reached a high-risk population, and what risk factors were associated with STI positivity.
METHODS: The website, www.iwantthekit.org, encouraged men ≥14 years of age to request a home self-sampling kit and a questionnaire on risk factors and acceptability of internet-based screening. Penile swabs and urine samples were tested for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis using a nucleic acid amplification test. Risk factors and acceptability were examined using chi squared tests and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of 501 samples received for testing, 106 (21%) were positive for at least one STI, 64 (13%) for chlamydia, 4 (1%) for gonorrhea, and 49 (10%) for trichomonas. In multivariable analyses, age, race, household income, and frequency of condom use were independently associated with infection with at least one STI. Of the total respondents, 34% had a prior STI; 29% reported having a partner with an STI, but only 13% reported always using a condom. Among the men who participated in this study, 77% preferred a self-administered specimen versus attending a clinic, 89% reported that swab use was easy, and 89% reported that they would use internet-based screening again.
CONCLUSIONS: Men who accessed internet-based screening had known risk factors for STIs and had a high prevalence of infection. Internet-based screening was acceptable and could reach these high-risk men who might not otherwise be reached through traditional means.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20644498      PMCID: PMC3187615          DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181e3d771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  37 in total

1.  The Internet as a newly emerging risk environment for sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  M McFarlane; S S Bull; C A Rietmeijer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Socioeconomic differences in sexually transmitted disease rates among black and white adolescents, San Francisco, 1990 to 1992.

Authors:  J M Ellen; R P Kohn; G A Bolan; S Shiboski; N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in women: results from a cohort study.

Authors:  M Laga; A Manoka; M Kivuvu; B Malele; M Tuliza; N Nzila; J Goeman; F Behets; V Batter; M Alary
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Screening for chlamydia--a key to the prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  S D Hillis; J N Wasserheit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Incident Chlamydia trachomatis infections among inner-city adolescent females.

Authors:  G R Burstein; C A Gaydos; M Diener-West; M R Howell; J M Zenilman; T C Quinn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Use of the Roche LightCycler instrument in a real-time PCR for Trichomonas vaginalis in urine samples from females and males.

Authors:  Justin Hardick; Samuel Yang; Shin Lin; Della Duncan; Charlotte Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Mycoplasma genitalium compared to chlamydia, gonorrhoea and trichomonas as an aetiological agent of urethritis in men attending STD clinics.

Authors:  C Gaydos; N E Maldeis; A Hardick; J Hardick; T C Quinn
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Use of urine polymerase chain reaction to define the prevalence and clinical presentation of Trichomonas vaginalis in men attending an STD clinic.

Authors:  K A Wendel; E J Erbelding; C A Gaydos; A M Rompalo
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection.

Authors:  D Scholes; A Stergachis; F E Heidrich; H Andrilla; K K Holmes; W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000.

Authors:  Hillard Weinstock; Stuart Berman; Willard Cates
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb
View more
  47 in total

1.  Acceptability and feasibility of self-sampling for the screening of sexually transmitted infections in cabana privacy shelters.

Authors:  Ellen Pittman; Hillary Purcell; Laura Dize; Charlotte Gaydos; Sherine Patterson-Rose; Frank Biro; DeAnna Owens; Lea E Widdice
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 1.359

2.  Assessing association between IWantTheKit risk quiz tool and sexually transmitted infection positivity in male users for sexually transmitted infection screening.

Authors:  Anuj V Patel; Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.359

Review 3.  A review of current practices to increase Chlamydia screening in the community--a consumer-centred social marketing perspective.

Authors:  Lyn Phillipson; Ross Gordon; Joanne Telenta; Chris Magee; Marty Janssen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Preferred methods of sexually transmitted infection service delivery among an urban sample of underserved midwestern men.

Authors:  Randolph D Hubach; Brian Dodge; Alissa Davis; Andrew D Smith; Gregory D Zimet; Barbara Van Der Pol
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 5.  Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Anna S Graseck; Shirley L Shih; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Comparison of self-obtained penile-meatal swabs to urine for the detection of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis.

Authors:  Laura Dize; Patricia Agreda; Nicole Quinn; Mathilda R Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Use of a risk quiz to predict infection for sexually transmitted infections: a retrospective analysis of acceptability and positivity.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  A randomized trial of home versus clinic-based sexually transmitted disease screening among men.

Authors:  Mary M Reagan; Hanna Xu; Shirley L Shih; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Performance of self-collected penile-meatal swabs compared to clinician-collected urethral swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Mycoplasma genitalium by nucleic acid amplification assays.

Authors:  Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Mathilda Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Vincent Marsiglia; Della Duncan; Justin Hardick; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Trichomonas vaginalis infection in men who submit self-collected penile swabs after internet recruitment.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mathilda R Barnes; Nicole Quinn; Mary Jett-Goheen; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.