BACKGROUND: Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been acceptable to women, and can reach high-risk populations. No prior published data describe internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in men. We studied whether internet-based screening was acceptable and reached a high-risk population, and what risk factors were associated with STI positivity. METHODS: The website, www.iwantthekit.org, encouraged men ≥14 years of age to request a home self-sampling kit and a questionnaire on risk factors and acceptability of internet-based screening. Penile swabs and urine samples were tested for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis using a nucleic acid amplification test. Risk factors and acceptability were examined using chi squared tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 501 samples received for testing, 106 (21%) were positive for at least one STI, 64 (13%) for chlamydia, 4 (1%) for gonorrhea, and 49 (10%) for trichomonas. In multivariable analyses, age, race, household income, and frequency of condom use were independently associated with infection with at least one STI. Of the total respondents, 34% had a prior STI; 29% reported having a partner with an STI, but only 13% reported always using a condom. Among the men who participated in this study, 77% preferred a self-administered specimen versus attending a clinic, 89% reported that swab use was easy, and 89% reported that they would use internet-based screening again. CONCLUSIONS: Men who accessed internet-based screening had known risk factors for STIs and had a high prevalence of infection. Internet-based screening was acceptable and could reach these high-risk men who might not otherwise be reached through traditional means.
BACKGROUND: Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been acceptable to women, and can reach high-risk populations. No prior published data describe internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in men. We studied whether internet-based screening was acceptable and reached a high-risk population, and what risk factors were associated with STI positivity. METHODS: The website, www.iwantthekit.org, encouraged men ≥14 years of age to request a home self-sampling kit and a questionnaire on risk factors and acceptability of internet-based screening. Penile swabs and urine samples were tested for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis using a nucleic acid amplification test. Risk factors and acceptability were examined using chi squared tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 501 samples received for testing, 106 (21%) were positive for at least one STI, 64 (13%) for chlamydia, 4 (1%) for gonorrhea, and 49 (10%) for trichomonas. In multivariable analyses, age, race, household income, and frequency of condom use were independently associated with infection with at least one STI. Of the total respondents, 34% had a prior STI; 29% reported having a partner with an STI, but only 13% reported always using a condom. Among the men who participated in this study, 77% preferred a self-administered specimen versus attending a clinic, 89% reported that swab use was easy, and 89% reported that they would use internet-based screening again. CONCLUSIONS:Men who accessed internet-based screening had known risk factors for STIs and had a high prevalence of infection. Internet-based screening was acceptable and could reach these high-risk men who might not otherwise be reached through traditional means.
Authors: M Laga; A Manoka; M Kivuvu; B Malele; M Tuliza; N Nzila; J Goeman; F Behets; V Batter; M Alary Journal: AIDS Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Ellen Pittman; Hillary Purcell; Laura Dize; Charlotte Gaydos; Sherine Patterson-Rose; Frank Biro; DeAnna Owens; Lea E Widdice Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Anuj V Patel; Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Randolph D Hubach; Brian Dodge; Alissa Davis; Andrew D Smith; Gregory D Zimet; Barbara Van Der Pol Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Laura Dize; Patricia Agreda; Nicole Quinn; Mathilda R Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Charlotte A Gaydos Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Mathilda Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Vincent Marsiglia; Della Duncan; Justin Hardick; Charlotte A Gaydos Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Charlotte A Gaydos; Mathilda R Barnes; Nicole Quinn; Mary Jett-Goheen; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2013-01-26 Impact factor: 3.519