Literature DB >> 25580560

A review of current practices to increase Chlamydia screening in the community--a consumer-centred social marketing perspective.

Lyn Phillipson1, Ross Gordon2, Joanne Telenta1, Chris Magee1, Marty Janssen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is one of the most frequently reported sexually transmitted infections (STI) in Australia, the UK and Europe. Yet, rates of screening for STIs remain low, especially in younger adults.
OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness of Chlamydia screening interventions targeting young adults in community-based settings, describe strategies utilized and assess them according to social marketing benchmark criteria. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic review of relevant literature between 2002 and 2012 in Medline, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Scopus and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health was undertaken.
RESULTS: Of 18 interventions identified, quality of evidence was low. Proportional screening rates varied, ranging from: 30.9 to 62.5% in educational settings (n = 4), 4.8 to 63% in media settings (n = 6) and from 5.7 to 44.5% in other settings (n = 7). Assessment against benchmark criteria found that interventions incorporating social marketing principles were more likely to achieve positive results, yet few did this comprehensively. Most demonstrated customer orientation and addressed barriers to presenting to a clinic for screening. Only one addressed barriers to presenting for treatment after a positive result. Promotional messages typically focused on providing facts and accessing a testing kit. Risk assessment tools appeared to promote screening among higher risk groups. Few evaluated treatment rates following positive results; therefore, impact of screening on treatment rates remains unknown. DISCUSSION: Future interventions should consider utilizing a comprehensive social marketing approach, using formative research to increase insight and segmentation and tailoring of screening interventions. Easy community access to both screening and treatment should be prioritized.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydia; consumer orientation; screening; sexual health; social marketing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25580560      PMCID: PMC5055217          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  33 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Genital chlamydial infections.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The effectiveness of social marketing interventions for health improvement: what's the evidence?

Authors:  Ross Gordon; Laura McDermott; Martine Stead; Kathryn Angus
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.427

3.  Stay in school? Results of a sexually transmitted diseases screening program in San Francisco high schools-2007.

Authors:  Pennan M Barry; Katherine C Scott; Jacqueline McCright; Ameera Snell; Monica Lee; Trish Bascom; Charlotte K Kent; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

5.  Online chlamydia testing: an innovative approach that appeals to young people.

Authors:  Kellie S H Kwan; Edwina A Jachimowicz; Lisa Bastian; Lewis Marshall; Donna B Mak
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Screening for chlamydial infection: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  . . . Sending out an SMS: an impact and outcome evaluation of the Western Australian Department of Health's 2005 chlamydia campaign.

Authors:  Alexa Wilkins; Donna B Mak
Journal:  Health Promot J Austr       Date:  2007-08

Review 8.  Effectiveness of chlamydia screening: systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Low; Nicole Bender; Linda Nartey; Aijing Shang; Judith M Stephenson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  "Pee-in-a-Pot": acceptability and uptake of on-site chlamydia screening in a student population in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Deirdre Vaughan; Emer O'Connell; Martin Cormican; Ruairi Brugha; Colette Faherty; Myles Balfe; Diarmuid O'Donovan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival--who will pee and post?

Authors:  Rachel Sacks-Davis; Judy Gold; Campbell K Aitken; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prevalence and Characterization of Undiagnosed Youths at Risk of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Azahara Reyes-Lacalle; Dolors Carnicer-Pont; Miriam Gómez Masvidal; Laura Montero-Pons; Rosa Cabedo-Ferreiro; Gemma Falguera-Puig
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.842

2.  STI Knowledge in Berlin Adolescents.

Authors:  Frederik Tilmann von Rosen; Antonella Juline von Rosen; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Inken Damberg; Peter Tinnemann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Emma Pearce; Kate Jolly; Isobel Marion Harris; Ada Adriano; David Moore; Malcolm Price; Jonathan Ross
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Increasing Chlamydia Testing Rates via Targeted Outreach.

Authors:  Deyze Badarane; Jordan Knox; Ana Camacho; Michael K Magill; Sonja Van Hala; Jessica L Jones
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2019-01-01

5.  Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review.

Authors:  Harumi Quezada-Yamamoto; Elizabeth Dubois; Nikolaos Mastellos; Salman Rawaf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.