Lyn Phillipson1, Ross Gordon2, Joanne Telenta1, Chris Magee1, Marty Janssen3. 1. Centre for Health Initiatives, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. 2. Marketing and Managements, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, HIV/AIDS and Related Programs (HARP) Unit, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is one of the most frequently reported sexually transmitted infections (STI) in Australia, the UK and Europe. Yet, rates of screening for STIs remain low, especially in younger adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness of Chlamydia screening interventions targeting young adults in community-based settings, describe strategies utilized and assess them according to social marketing benchmark criteria. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic review of relevant literature between 2002 and 2012 in Medline, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Scopus and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health was undertaken. RESULTS: Of 18 interventions identified, quality of evidence was low. Proportional screening rates varied, ranging from: 30.9 to 62.5% in educational settings (n = 4), 4.8 to 63% in media settings (n = 6) and from 5.7 to 44.5% in other settings (n = 7). Assessment against benchmark criteria found that interventions incorporating social marketing principles were more likely to achieve positive results, yet few did this comprehensively. Most demonstrated customer orientation and addressed barriers to presenting to a clinic for screening. Only one addressed barriers to presenting for treatment after a positive result. Promotional messages typically focused on providing facts and accessing a testing kit. Risk assessment tools appeared to promote screening among higher risk groups. Few evaluated treatment rates following positive results; therefore, impact of screening on treatment rates remains unknown. DISCUSSION: Future interventions should consider utilizing a comprehensive social marketing approach, using formative research to increase insight and segmentation and tailoring of screening interventions. Easy community access to both screening and treatment should be prioritized.
BACKGROUND:Chlamydia trachomatis is one of the most frequently reported sexually transmitted infections (STI) in Australia, the UK and Europe. Yet, rates of screening for STIs remain low, especially in younger adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness of Chlamydia screening interventions targeting young adults in community-based settings, describe strategies utilized and assess them according to social marketing benchmark criteria. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic review of relevant literature between 2002 and 2012 in Medline, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Scopus and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health was undertaken. RESULTS: Of 18 interventions identified, quality of evidence was low. Proportional screening rates varied, ranging from: 30.9 to 62.5% in educational settings (n = 4), 4.8 to 63% in media settings (n = 6) and from 5.7 to 44.5% in other settings (n = 7). Assessment against benchmark criteria found that interventions incorporating social marketing principles were more likely to achieve positive results, yet few did this comprehensively. Most demonstrated customer orientation and addressed barriers to presenting to a clinic for screening. Only one addressed barriers to presenting for treatment after a positive result. Promotional messages typically focused on providing facts and accessing a testing kit. Risk assessment tools appeared to promote screening among higher risk groups. Few evaluated treatment rates following positive results; therefore, impact of screening on treatment rates remains unknown. DISCUSSION: Future interventions should consider utilizing a comprehensive social marketing approach, using formative research to increase insight and segmentation and tailoring of screening interventions. Easy community access to both screening and treatment should be prioritized.
Authors: Pennan M Barry; Katherine C Scott; Jacqueline McCright; Ameera Snell; Monica Lee; Trish Bascom; Charlotte K Kent; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-04-26
Authors: Frederik Tilmann von Rosen; Antonella Juline von Rosen; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Inken Damberg; Peter Tinnemann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Emma Pearce; Kate Jolly; Isobel Marion Harris; Ada Adriano; David Moore; Malcolm Price; Jonathan Ross Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 3.519