Literature DB >> 12583593

Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Patricia Adair Gowaty1, Rebecca Steinichen, Wyatt W Anderson.   

Abstract

The pre-mating behavior of female Drosophila pseudoobscura has been considered passive and "coy" relative to more active, "ardent," and indiscriminate male behavior. To test whether this long-held view-the "received wisdom" about mating behavior in Drosophila-is really true we carried out observations on how often D. pseudoobscura females approached males prior to courtship and copulation. By including only virgin females and males in the experiments, we eliminated the possibility that males are "coy" due to sperm limitation and females flexibly "coy" due to male manipulations that may affect the duration of remating inhibition. We observed the movements of females and males in vials during the first five minutes of exposure to one another. Video records revealed females went toward males as frequently as males toward females; we inferred that females were as interested in males as males in females. The total number of offspring emerging as adults correlated significantly with mutual, precourtship interest of both males and females in their vial-mates and latency to copulation. Thus, we hypothesize that females in nature approach males, perhaps actively soliciting male courtship simply by remaining close to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12583593     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00178.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  Polyandry increases offspring viability and mother productivity but does not decrease mother survival in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Yong-Kyu Kim; Jessica Rawlings; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Transgenerational epigenetic imprints on mate preference.

Authors:  David Crews; Andrea C Gore; Timothy S Hsu; Nygerma L Dangleben; Michael Spinetta; Timothy Schallert; Matthew D Anway; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Conflict between direct and indirect benefits of female choice in desert Drosophila.

Authors:  Elen Onealt; Tim Connallon; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about time.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Stephen P Hubbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Wyatt W Anderson; Cynthia K Bluhm; Lee C Drickamer; Yong-Kyu Kim; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.

Authors:  Thomas P Gosden; Adam J Reddiex; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The evolution of multiple mating: Costs and benefits of polyandry to females and of polygyny to males.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.160

8.  Variation in male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mutual mate choice: when it pays both sexes to avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Cédric Zimmer; Colette Rivault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gene bionetworks involved in the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of altered mate preference: environmental epigenetics and evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Michael K Skinner; Marina I Savenkova; Bin Zhang; Andrea C Gore; David Crews
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.