OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) on reproductive outcome by evaluating the most statistically significant bias factors using logistic regression. DESIGN: Prospective blind observational cohort study. SETTING: University affiliated private IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ten male partners of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with fresh or thawed sperm with the women's own or donated oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): SDF determined before and after swim-up (n=420), odds ratio calculated of the effect of an increase of one unit of SDF on pregnancy, and stratified regression analysis performed to evaluate the confusion effect of oocyte quality, sperm origin, and the fertilization procedure. RESULT(S): The effect of SDF on pregnancy was not affected by sperm origin (fresh or thawed) or fertilization procedure when measured both before and after swim-up. When oocytes from infertile patients were employed, SDF had a statistically significant negative impact on chance of pregnancy. For every 10% increase in SDF, the probability of not achieving pregnancy increased by 1.31. When donated oocytes were employed, SDF did not have a statistically significant effect. CONCLUSION(S): The effect of SDF on the probability of pregnancy can be calculated independent of the fertilization procedure or sperm origin. Oocyte quality conditions the extent of the negative impact of SDF on pregnancy; this can be overcome when good quality oocytes are employed.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) on reproductive outcome by evaluating the most statistically significant bias factors using logistic regression. DESIGN: Prospective blind observational cohort study. SETTING: University affiliated private IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ten male partners of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with fresh or thawed sperm with the women's own or donated oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): SDF determined before and after swim-up (n=420), odds ratio calculated of the effect of an increase of one unit of SDF on pregnancy, and stratified regression analysis performed to evaluate the confusion effect of oocyte quality, sperm origin, and the fertilization procedure. RESULT(S): The effect of SDF on pregnancy was not affected by sperm origin (fresh or thawed) or fertilization procedure when measured both before and after swim-up. When oocytes from infertilepatients were employed, SDF had a statistically significant negative impact on chance of pregnancy. For every 10% increase in SDF, the probability of not achieving pregnancy increased by 1.31. When donated oocytes were employed, SDF did not have a statistically significant effect. CONCLUSION(S): The effect of SDF on the probability of pregnancy can be calculated independent of the fertilization procedure or sperm origin. Oocyte quality conditions the extent of the negative impact of SDF on pregnancy; this can be overcome when good quality oocytes are employed.
Authors: Jaime Gosálvez; Pedro Caballero; Carmen López-Fernández; Leonor Ortega; José Andrés Guijarro; José Luís Fernández; Stephen D Johnston; Rocío Nuñez-Calonge Journal: Asian J Androl Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 3.285
Authors: C Bichara; B Berby; A Rives; F Jumeau; M Letailleur; V Setif; L Sibert; C Rondanino; Nathalie Rives Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan Journal: Andrologia Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 2.775