Literature DB >> 20643145

Orientation of small multidrug resistance transporter subunits in the membrane: correlation with the positive-inside rule.

Magdalena A Kolbusz1, Ramon ter Horst, Dirk-Jan Slotboom, Juke S Lolkema.   

Abstract

Small multidrug resistance (SMR) transport proteins provide a model for the evolution of larger two-domain transport proteins. The orientation in the membrane of 27 proteins from the SMR family was determined using the reporter fusion technique. Nine members were encoded monocistronically (singles) and shown to insert in both orientations (dual topology). Eighteen members were encoded in pairs on the chromosome and shown to insert in fixed orientations; the two proteins in each pair invariably had opposite orientations in the membrane. Interaction between the two proteins in pairs was demonstrated by copurification. The orientation in the membrane of either protein in the pair was affected only marginally by the presence of the other protein. For the proteins in pairs, the orientation in the membrane correlated well with the distribution of positively charges residues (R+K) over the cytoplasmic and extracellular loops (positive-inside rule). In contrast, dual-topology insertion of the singles was predicted less well by the positive-inside rule. Three singles were predicted to insert in a single orientation with the N-terminus and the C-terminus at the extracellular side of the membrane. Analysis of charge distributions suggests the requirement of a threshold number of charges in the cytoplasmic loops for the positive-inside rule to be of predictive value. It is concluded that a combined analysis of gene organization on the chromosome and phylogeny is sufficient to distinguish between fixed or dual topology of SMR members and, probably, similar types of membrane proteins. The positive-inside rule can be used to predict the orientation of members in pairs, but is not suitable as a sole predictor of dual topology. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643145     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  6 in total

Review 1.  Lipid-Assisted Membrane Protein Folding and Topogenesis.

Authors:  William Dowhan; Heidi Vitrac; Mikhail Bogdanov
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Stable membrane orientations of small dual-topology membrane proteins.

Authors:  Nir Fluman; Victor Tobiasson; Gunnar von Heijne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Undecided membrane proteins insert in random topologies. Up, down and sideways: it does not really matter.

Authors:  Shimon Schuldiner
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Evidence that diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) has dual membrane topology in the endoplasmic reticulum of HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Haja R Wurie; Linda Buckett; Victor A Zammit
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Determining the N-terminal orientations of recombinant transmembrane proteins in the Escherichia coli plasma membrane.

Authors:  Chien-Hsien Lee; Chia-Cheng Chou; Min-Feng Hsu; Andrew H-J Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Inducing conformational preference of the membrane protein transporter EmrE through conservative mutations.

Authors:  Maureen Leninger; Ampon Sae Her; Nathaniel J Traaseth
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.