OBJECTIVE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) offers the promise of improved tumor localization in prostate cancer but the technique suffers from susceptibility-induced artifacts that limit the achievable resolution. The present work employs a reduced field-of-view technique that enables high-resolution DTI of the prostate at 3T. Feasibility of the approach is demonstrated in a clinical study including 26 patients and 14 controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reduced field-of-view acquisition was established by non-coplanar application of the excitation and the refocusing pulse in conjunction with outer volume suppression. Accuracy for cancer detection of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping and T2-weighted imaging was calculated and compared with reference to the findings of trans-rectal ultrasound-guided octant biopsy. Mean ADCs and fractional anisotropy (FA) values in the patients with positive and negative biopsies were compared to each other and to the controls. RESULTS: Fine anatomical details were successfully depicted on the ADC maps with sub-millimeter resolution. Accuracy for prostate cancer detection was 73.5% for ADC maps and 71% for T2-weighted images, respectively. Cohen's kappa (κ=0.48) indicated moderate agreement of the two methods. The mean ADCs were significantly lower, the FA values higher, in the patients with positive biopsy than in the patients with negative biopsy and the controls. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the FA values, but not the ADCs, were slightly overestimated. Bootstrap analysis revealed that the ADC, but not the FA value, is a highly repeatable marker. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the present work introduces a new approach for high-resolution DTI of the prostate enabling a more accurate detection of focal tumors especially useful in screening populations or as a potential navigator for image-guided biopsy.
OBJECTIVE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) offers the promise of improved tumor localization in prostate cancer but the technique suffers from susceptibility-induced artifacts that limit the achievable resolution. The present work employs a reduced field-of-view technique that enables high-resolution DTI of the prostate at 3T. Feasibility of the approach is demonstrated in a clinical study including 26 patients and 14 controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reduced field-of-view acquisition was established by non-coplanar application of the excitation and the refocusing pulse in conjunction with outer volume suppression. Accuracy for cancer detection of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping and T2-weighted imaging was calculated and compared with reference to the findings of trans-rectal ultrasound-guided octant biopsy. Mean ADCs and fractional anisotropy (FA) values in the patients with positive and negative biopsies were compared to each other and to the controls. RESULTS: Fine anatomical details were successfully depicted on the ADC maps with sub-millimeter resolution. Accuracy for prostate cancer detection was 73.5% for ADC maps and 71% for T2-weighted images, respectively. Cohen's kappa (κ=0.48) indicated moderate agreement of the two methods. The mean ADCs were significantly lower, the FA values higher, in the patients with positive biopsy than in the patients with negative biopsy and the controls. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the FA values, but not the ADCs, were slightly overestimated. Bootstrap analysis revealed that the ADC, but not the FA value, is a highly repeatable marker. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the present work introduces a new approach for high-resolution DTI of the prostate enabling a more accurate detection of focal tumors especially useful in screening populations or as a potential navigator for image-guided biopsy.
Authors: Kolja M Thierfelder; Michael K Scherr; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Jakob Weiß; Olaf Dietrich; Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Josef Pfeuffer; Konstantin Nikolaou; Daniel Theisen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Lawrence P Panych; Janice Fairhurst; Elmira Hassanzadeh; Ravi T Seethamraju; Clare M Tempany; Stephan E Maier Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Leonardo K Bittencourt; Ulrike I Attenberger; Daniel Lima; Ralph Strecker; Andre de Oliveira; Stefan O Schoenberg; Emerson L Gasparetto; Daniel Hausmann Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2014-06-28
Authors: Sandeep Hedgire; Alexey Tonyushkin; Aoife Kilcoyne; Jason A Efstathiou; Peter F Hahn; Mukesh Harisinghani Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2016-04-28
Authors: Maarten W Barentsz; Valentina Taviani; Jung M Chang; Debra M Ikeda; Kanae K Miyake; Suchandrima Banerjee; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Brian A Hargreaves; Bruce L Daniel Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Rachel W Chan; Constantin Von Deuster; Christian T Stoeck; Jack Harmer; Shonit Punwani; Navin Ramachandran; Sebastian Kozerke; David Atkinson Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 4.044