Literature DB >> 20632576

Enhancements to commissioning techniques and quality assurance of brachytherapy treatment planning systems that use model-based dose calculation algorithms.

Mark J Rivard1, Luc Beaulieu, Firas Mourtada.   

Abstract

The current standard for brachytherapy dose calculations is based on the AAPM TG-43 formalism. Simplifications used in the TG-43 formalism have been challenged by many publications over the past decade. With the continuous increase in computing power, approaches based on fundamental physics processes or physics models such as the linear-Boltzmann transport equation are now applicable in a clinical setting. Thus, model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have been introduced to address TG-43 limitations for brachytherapy. The MBDCA approach results in a paradigm shift, which will require a concerted effort to integrate them properly into the radiation therapy community. MBDCA will improve treatment planning relative to the implementation of the traditional TG-43 formalism by accounting for individualized, patient-specific radiation scatter conditions, and the radiological effect of material heterogeneities differing from water. A snapshot of the current status of MBDCA and AAPM Task Group reports related to the subject of QA recommendations for brachytherapy treatment planning is presented. Some simplified Monte Carlo simulation results are also presented to delineate the effects MBDCA are called to account for and facilitate the discussion on suggestions for (i) new QA standards to augment current societal recommendations, (ii) consideration of dose specification such as dose to medium in medium, collisional kerma to medium in medium, or collisional kerma to water in medium, and (iii) infrastructure needed to uniformly introduce these new algorithms. Suggestions in this Vision 20/20 article may serve as a basis for developing future standards to be recommended by professional societies such as the AAPM, ESTRO, and ABS toward providing consistent clinical implementation throughout the brachytherapy community and rigorous quality management of MBDCA-based treatment planning systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632576     DOI: 10.1118/1.3429131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  A dosimetric uncertainty analysis for photon-emitting brachytherapy sources: report of AAPM Task Group No. 138 and GEC-ESTRO.

Authors:  Larry A DeWerd; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Ali S Meigooni; Michael G Mitch; Mark J Rivard; Kurt E Stump; Bruce R Thomadsen; Jack L M Venselaar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of dose calculation methods for brachytherapy of intraocular tumors.

Authors:  Mark J Rivard; Sou-Tung Chiu-Tsao; Paul T Finger; Ali S Meigooni; Christopher S Melhus; Firas Mourtada; Mary E Napolitano; D W O Rogers; Rowan M Thomson; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Treatment planning of a skin-sparing conical breast brachytherapy applicator using conventional brachytherapy software.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Christopher S Melhus; Shirin Sioshansi; Mark J Rivard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A Monte Carlo evaluation for effects of probable dimensional uncertainties of low dose rate brachytherapy seeds on dose.

Authors:  Berkay Camgöz; Mehmet N Kumru
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-07-19

Review 5.  Dosimetric audit in brachytherapy.

Authors:  A L Palmer; D A Bradley; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Impact of heterogeneity-based dose calculation using a deterministic grid-based Boltzmann equation solver for intracavitary brachytherapy.

Authors:  Justin K Mikell; Ann H Klopp; Graciela M N Gonzalez; Kelly D Kisling; Michael J Price; Paula A Berner; Patricia J Eifel; Firas Mourtada
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  A directional 103Pd brachytherapy device: Dosimetric characterization and practical aspects for clinical use.

Authors:  Mark J Rivard
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Multi-axis dose accumulation of noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy through biomechanical modeling of tissue deformation using the finite element method.

Authors:  Mark J Rivard; Hamid R Ghadyani; Adam D Bastien; Nicholas N Lutz; Jaroslaw T Hepel
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-02-17

9.  Film based verification of calculation algorithms used for brachytherapy planning-getting ready for upcoming challenges of MBDCA.

Authors:  Grzegorz Zwierzchowski; Grzegorz Bielęda; Janusz Skowronek; Magdalena Mazur
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-08-16

10.  Physics-aspects of dose accuracy in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy: source dosimetry, treatment planning, equipment performance and in vivo verification techniques.

Authors:  Antony Palmer; David Bradley; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.