Literature DB >> 20631368

Overranging at multisection CT: an underestimated source of excess radiation exposure.

Arnold Schilham1, Aart J van der Molen, Mathias Prokop, Hugo W de Jong.   

Abstract

To reconstruct the first and last sections of a helical computed tomographic (CT) scan, the scan length is automatically extended beyond the planned image boundaries, a phenomenon known as overranging. With common 16-section CT scanning protocols, the overrange length is between 3 and 6 cm. For scanners with 64 or more sections, this length will be much greater, since overranging increases as pitch or detector collimation increases. Manufacturers have equipped the latest generation of CT scanners (128 sections or more) with overrange dose-reducing innovations that reduce overranging by typically up to 50%, which in the best cases reduces overranging to that of the previous scanner models (64 sections). To reduce the impact of overranging on radiosensitive organs just outside the planned scan region, it is best to use an axial protocol rather than a helical protocol. If this is not an option, lowering the pitch or the detector collimation will significantly reduce overranging. Finally, CT examinations should be planned in such a way that radiosensitive organs are as far as possible from the imaged volume.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20631368     DOI: 10.1148/rg.304095167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  18 in total

1.  Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey.

Authors:  Federica Palorini; Daniela Origgi; Claudio Granata; Domenica Matranga; Sergio Salerno
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of radiation dose estimates, image noise, and scan duration in pediatric body imaging for volumetric and helical modes on 320-detector CT and helical mode on 64-detector CT.

Authors:  Jennifer H Johnston; Daniel J Podberesky; Terry T Yoshizumi; Erin Angel; Greta Toncheva; David B Larson; John C Egelhoff; Colin Anderson-Evans; Giao B Nguyen; Alessandra Barelli; Christopher Alsip; Shelia R Salisbury; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-01

3.  Dosimetric evaluation of a 256-slice computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  Anna Radice; Claudio Ielasi; Gabriele D'Andrea; Nicoletta Paruccini; Andrea Crespi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Accuracy of Monte Carlo simulations compared to in-vivo MDCT dosimetry.

Authors:  Maryam Bostani; Jonathon W Mueller; Kyle McMillan; Dianna D Cody; Chris H Cagnon; John J DeMarco; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of an adaptive detector collimation for prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography with third-generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Michael Messerli; Patricia Dewes; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christophe Arendt; Simon Wildermuth; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Pediatric CT: strategies to lower radiation dose.

Authors:  Claudia Zacharias; Adam M Alessio; Randolph K Otto; Ramesh S Iyer; Grace S Philips; Jonathan O Swanson; Mahesh M Thapa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Optimised z-axis coverage at multidetector-row CT in adults suspected of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  N Brassart; C Winant; D Tack; P A Gevenois; V De Maertelaer; C Keyzer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Three-dimensional skull models as a problem-solving tool in suspected child abuse.

Authors:  Sanjay P Prabhu; Alice W Newton; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Paul K Kleinman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-11-25

9.  Patient-specific organ and effective dose estimates in pediatric oncology computed tomography.

Authors:  Yiming Gao; Brian Quinn; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Gerald Behr; Usman Mahmood; Daniel Long; X George Xu; Jean St Germain; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.685

10.  Lens Dose Reduction by Patient Posture Modification During Neck CT.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Mosher; John A Butman; Les R Folio; Nadia M Biassou; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.