Literature DB >> 20631338

Analysis of antibody responses to protective antigen-based anthrax vaccines through use of competitive assays.

Rebecca A Brady1, Anita Verma, Bruce D Meade, Drusilla L Burns.   

Abstract

The licensed anthrax vaccine and many of the new anthrax vaccines being developed are based on protective antigen (PA), a nontoxic component of anthrax toxin. For this reason, an understanding of the immune response to PA vaccination is important. In this study, we examined the antibody response elicited by PA-based vaccines and identified the domains of PA that contribute to that response in humans as well as nonhuman primates (NHPs) and rabbits, animal species that will be used to generate efficacy data to support approval of new anthrax vaccines. To this end, we developed a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using purified recombinant forms of intact PA and its individual domains. We found that PA-based vaccines elicited IgG antibodies to each of the four PA domains in all three species. We also developed a competitive toxin neutralization assay, which showed that rabbits, NHPs, and humans all have functional antibody populations that bind to domains 1, 3, and 4. While the domain specificities of the antibody responses elicited by PA-based vaccines were similar in humans, NHPs, and rabbits, competitive assays suggested that humans may have a more significant secondary population of IgG antibodies that bind to partially unfolded or incorrectly folded PA. These findings provide information that will be useful when linking animal protection data to humans via an antibody bridge to establish efficacy of new anthrax vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20631338      PMCID: PMC2944443          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00145-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  28 in total

1.  Structure of heptameric protective antigen bound to an anthrax toxin receptor: a role for receptor in pH-dependent pore formation.

Authors:  D Borden Lacy; Darran J Wigelsworth; Roman A Melnyk; Stephen C Harrison; R John Collier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Immunogenicity of recombinant protective antigen and efficacy against aerosol challenge with anthrax.

Authors:  E D Williamson; I Hodgson; N J Walker; A W Topping; M G Duchars; J M Mott; J Estep; C Lebutt; H C Flick-Smith; H E Jones; H Li; C P Quinn
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Characterization of lethal factor binding and cell receptor binding domains of protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Stephen F Little; Jeanne M Novak; John R Lowe; Stephen H Leppla; Yogendra Singh; Kurt R Klimpel; Burton C Lidgerding; Arthur M Friedlander
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 4.  Past, imminent and future human medical countermeasures for anthrax.

Authors:  L W J Baillie
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 5.  Anthrax vaccines.

Authors:  A M Friedlander; S L Welkos; B E Ivins
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 6.  Anthrax toxin.

Authors:  R John Collier; John A T Young
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 13.827

7.  Frequency and domain specificity of toxin-neutralizing paratopes in the human antibody response to anthrax vaccine adsorbed.

Authors:  Donald Reason; Justine Liberato; Jinying Sun; Wendy Keitel; Jianhui Zhou
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Vaccines: countering anthrax: vaccines and immunoglobulins.

Authors:  John D Grabenstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Paratope diversity in the human antibody response to Bacillus anthracis protective antigen.

Authors:  Jianhui Zhou; Anuska Ullal; Justine Liberato; Jinying Sun; Wendy Keitel; Donald C Reason
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.407

10.  Proteolytic activation of bacterial toxins by eukaryotic cells is performed by furin and by additional cellular proteases.

Authors:  V M Gordon; K R Klimpel; N Arora; M A Henderson; S H Leppla
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of defined combinations of monoclonal antibodies in anthrax toxin neutralization assays and their synergistic action.

Authors:  Miriam M Ngundi; Bruce D Meade; Stephen F Little; Conrad P Quinn; Cindi R Corbett; Rebecca A Brady; Drusilla L Burns
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-03-21

2.  Structural and immunological analysis of anthrax recombinant protective antigen adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.

Authors:  Leslie Wagner; Anita Verma; Bruce D Meade; Karine Reiter; David L Narum; Rebecca A Brady; Stephen F Little; Drusilla L Burns
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-07-18

3.  Targeting Cancer Gene Dependencies with Anthrax-Mediated Delivery of Peptide Nucleic Acids.

Authors:  Zeyu Lu; Brenton R Paolella; Nicholas L Truex; Alexander R Loftis; Xiaoli Liao; Amy E Rabideau; Meredith S Brown; John Busanovich; Rameen Beroukhim; Bradley L Pentelute
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Characterization of the native form of anthrax lethal factor for use in the toxin neutralization assay.

Authors:  Hang Lu; Jason Catania; Katalin Baranji; Jie Feng; Mili Gu; Janet Lathey; Diane Sweeny; Hannah Sanford; Kavita Sapru; Terry Patamawenu; June-Home Chen; Alan Ng; Zenbework Fesseha; Stefanie Kluepfel-Stahl; Jacob Minang; David Alleva
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-05-01

Review 5.  Current Status and Trends in Prophylaxis and Management of Anthrax Disease.

Authors:  Vladimir Savransky; Boris Ionin; Joshua Reece
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-05-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.