Literature DB >> 23637044

Characterization of the native form of anthrax lethal factor for use in the toxin neutralization assay.

Hang Lu1, Jason Catania, Katalin Baranji, Jie Feng, Mili Gu, Janet Lathey, Diane Sweeny, Hannah Sanford, Kavita Sapru, Terry Patamawenu, June-Home Chen, Alan Ng, Zenbework Fesseha, Stefanie Kluepfel-Stahl, Jacob Minang, David Alleva.   

Abstract

The cell-based anthrax toxin neutralization assay (TNA) is used to determine functional antibody titers of sera from animals and humans immunized with anthrax vaccines. The anthrax lethal toxin is a critical reagent of the TNA composed of protective antigen (PA) and lethal factor (LF), which are neutralization targets of serum antibodies. Cytotoxic potency of recombinant LF (rLF) lots can vary substantially, causing a challenge in producing a renewable supply of this reagent for validated TNAs. To address this issue, we characterized a more potent rLF variant (rLF-A) with the exact native LF amino acid sequence that lacks the additional N-terminal histidine and methionine residues present on the commonly used form of rLF (rLF-HMA) as a consequence of the expression vector. rLF-A can be used at 4 to 6 ng/ml (in contrast to 40 ng/ml rLF-HMA) with 50 ng/ml recombinant PA (rPA) to achieve 95 to 99% cytotoxicity. In the presence of 50 ng/ml rPA, both rLF-A and rLF-HMA allowed for similar potencies (50% effective dilution) among immune sera in the TNA. rPA, but not rLF, was the dominant factor in determining potency of serum samples containing anti-PA antibodies only or an excess of anti-PA relative to anti-rLF antibodies. Such anti-PA content is reflected in immune sera derived from most anthrax vaccines in development. These results support that 7- to 10-fold less rLF-A can be used in place of rLF-HMA without changing TNA serum dilution curve parameters, thus extending the use of a single rLF lot and a consistent, renewable supply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23637044      PMCID: PMC3697443          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00046-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  31 in total

Review 1.  Anthrax toxin: receptor binding, internalization, pore formation, and translocation.

Authors:  John A T Young; R John Collier
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Immune response to two different dosing schedules of the anthrax vaccine precipitated (AVP) vaccine.

Authors:  Matthew J Hepburn; E Hugh Dyson; Andrew J H Simpson; Karen E Brenneman; Nicola Bailey; Lucy Wilkinson; Rebecca Hornby; Alfred J Mateczun; Matthew G Bell; Leslie W J Baillie
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Comparability of ELISA and toxin neutralization to measure immunogenicity of Protective Antigen in mice, as part of a potency test for anthrax vaccines.

Authors:  P M Parreiras; L A Sirota; L D Wagner; S L Menzies; J L Arciniega
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  Anthrax toxins: a weapon to systematically dismantle the host immune defenses.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Tournier; Silvia Rossi Paccani; Anne Quesnel-Hellmann; Cosima T Baldari
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2009-06-26

5.  Optimized production and purification of Bacillus anthracis lethal factor.

Authors:  S Park; S H Leppla
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.650

6.  Anthrax vaccine-induced antibodies provide cross-species prediction of survival to aerosol challenge.

Authors:  Michael P Fay; Dean A Follmann; Freyja Lynn; Jarad M Schiffer; Gregory V Stark; Robert Kohberger; Conrad P Quinn; Edwin O Nuzum
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Marked enhancement of the immune response to BioThrax® (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed) by the TLR9 agonist CPG 7909 in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Dianna Rynkiewicz; Melinda Rathkopf; Iain Sim; A Thomas Waytes; Robert J Hopkins; Lallan Giri; Deborah DeMuria; Janet Ransom; James Quinn; Gary S Nabors; Carl J Nielsen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Advances in the development of next-generation anthrax vaccines.

Authors:  Arthur M Friedlander; Stephen F Little
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Defining a serological correlate of protection in rabbits for a recombinant anthrax vaccine.

Authors:  S F Little; B E Ivins; P F Fellows; M L M Pitt; S L W Norris; G P Andrews
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Role of N-terminal amino acids in the potency of anthrax lethal factor.

Authors:  Pradeep K Gupta; Mahtab Moayeri; Devorah Crown; Rasem J Fattah; Stephen H Leppla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of reduced dose schedules and intramuscular injection of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunological response and safety profile: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jennifer G Wright; Brian D Plikaytis; Charles E Rose; Scott D Parker; Janiine Babcock; Wendy Keitel; Hana El Sahly; Gregory A Poland; Robert M Jacobson; Harry L Keyserling; Vera A Semenova; Han Li; Jarad Schiffer; Hanan Dababneh; Sandra K Martin; Stacey W Martin; Nina Marano; Nancy E Messonnier; Conrad P Quinn
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 4.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.