Literature DB >> 20630992

Non-vigorous physical activity and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

James Woodcock1, Oscar H Franco, Nicola Orsini, Ian Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have found physical activity to be associated with lower mortality, the dose-response relationship remains unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we quantify the dose-response relationship of non-vigorous physical activity and all-cause mortality.
METHODS: We aimed to include all cohort studies in adult populations with a sample size of more than 10 000 participants that estimated the effect of different levels of light or moderate physical activity on all-cause mortality. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane (DARE), Web of Science and Global Health (June 2009). We used dose-response meta-regression models to estimate the relation between non-vigorous physical activity and mortality.
RESULTS: We identified 22 studies that met our inclusion criteria, containing 977 925 (334 738 men and 643 187 women) people. There was considerable variation between the studies in their categorization of physical activity and adjustment for potential confounders. We found that 2.5 h/week (equivalent to 30 min daily of moderate intensity activity on 5 days a week) compared with no activity was associated with a reduction in mortality risk of 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15-24], while 7 h/week of moderate activity compared with no activity reduced the mortality risk by 24% (95% CI 19-29). We found a smaller effect in studies that looked at walking alone.
CONCLUSION: Being physically active reduces the risk of all-cause mortality. The largest benefit was found from moving from no activity to low levels of activity, but even at high levels of activity benefits accrue from additional activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630992     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  149 in total

Review 1.  Exercise: friend or foe?

Authors:  Frida J Dangardt; William J McKenna; Thomas F Lüscher; John E Deanfield
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Positive messaging promotes walking in older adults.

Authors:  Nanna Notthoff; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-06

Review 3.  Policies to Promote Active Travel: Evidence from Reviews of the Literature.

Authors:  Meghan Winters; Ralph Buehler; Thomas Götschi
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

Review 4.  Exosomes as Mediators of the Systemic Adaptations to Endurance Exercise.

Authors:  Adeel Safdar; Mark A Tarnopolsky
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  Use of Physical Activity Monitors in Rheumatic Populations.

Authors:  Christine A Pellegrini; Sara M Powell; Nicholas Mook; Katherine DeVivo; Linda Ehrlich-Jones
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Exercise at 65 and beyond.

Authors:  Mark E Batt; Jeffrey Tanji; Mats Börjesson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Exposure analysis methods impact associations between maternal physical activity and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Kelly R Evenson; William Goodnight
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-02-05

8.  Interactive Effects of Aerobic Fitness, Strength, and Obesity on Mortality in Men.

Authors:  Casey Crump; Jan Sundquist; Marilyn A Winkleby; Kristina Sundquist
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Effects of categorization and self-report bias on estimates of the association between obesity and mortality.

Authors:  Samuel H Preston; Ezra Fishman; Andrew Stokes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Small sustainable monetary incentives versus charitable donations to promote exercise: Rationale, design, and baseline data from a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  David M Williams; Harold H Lee; Lauren Connell; Holly Boyle; Jessica Emerson; Kelley Strohacker; Omar Galárraga
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.